Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29412363›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2018

Preemptive use of etodolac on tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial.

Savil Costa Vaez, André Luís Faria-E-Silva, Alessandro Dourado Loguércio, Micaelle Tenório Guedes Fernandes, Flávia Pardo Salata Nahsan

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Savil Costa VaezUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
André Luís Faria-E-SilvaUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Alessandro Dourado LoguércioUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil.
Micaelle Tenório Guedes FernandesUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Flávia Pardo Salata NahsanUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study determined the effectiveness of the preemptive administration of etodolac on risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and the bleaching effect caused by in-office bleaching using 35% hydrogen peroxide. Fifty patients were selected for this tripleblind, randomized, crossover, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Etodolac (400 mg) or placebo was administrated in a single-dose 1 hour prior to the bleaching procedure. The whitening treatment with 35% hydrogen peroxide was carried out in two sessions with a 7-day interval. Tooth sensitivity was assessed before, during, and 24 hours after the procedure using the analog visual scale and the verbal rating scale. Color alteration was assessed by a bleach guide scale, 7 days after each session. Relative risk of sensitivity was calculated and adjusted by session, while overall risk was compared by the McNemar's test. Data on the sensitivity level of both scales and color shade were subjected to Friedman, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively (α=0.05). The preemptive administration of etodolac did not affect the risk of tooth sensitivity and the level of sensitivity reported, regardless of the time of evaluation and scale used. The sequence of treatment allocation did not affect bleaching effectiveness, while the second session resulted in additional color modification. The preemptive administration of etodolac in a single dose 1 hour prior to in-office tooth bleaching did not alter tooth color, and the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity reported by patients. A single-dose preemptive administration of 400 mg of etodolac did not affect either risk of tooth sensitivity or level of sensitivity reported by patients, during or after the in-office tooth bleaching procedure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultColorCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDentin Desensitizing AgentsDentin SensitivityEtodolacFemaleHumansHydrogen PeroxideMalePain MeasurementReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDentin Desensitizing AgentsEtodolacHydrogen PeroxideTooth Bleaching Agents

Identifiers

PMID29412363
PMCPMC5777424
OpenAlexW2786156555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.