Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29412362›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2018

Can whitening toothpastes maintain the optical stability of enamel over time?

Eduardo Moreira da Silva, Juliana Nunes da Silva Meirelles Dória Maia, Carine Gnatiuk Mitraud, Juliana do Espírito Santo Russo, Laiza Tatiana Poskus, José Guilherme Antunes Guimarães

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eduardo Moreira da SilvaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Odontologia, Laboratório Analítico de Biomateriais Restauradores, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Juliana Nunes da Silva Meirelles Dória MaiaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Odontologia, Laboratório Analítico de Biomateriais Restauradores, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Carine Gnatiuk MitraudUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Odontologia, Laboratório Analítico de Biomateriais Restauradores, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Juliana do Espírito Santo RussoUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Odontologia, Laboratório Analítico de Biomateriais Restauradores, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Laiza Tatiana PoskusUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Odontologia, Laboratório Analítico de Biomateriais Restauradores, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
José Guilherme Antunes GuimarãesUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Odontologia, Laboratório Analítico de Biomateriais Restauradores, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides the effects on the health of individuals, cigarette smoking can also interfere with the appearance of their teeth. To evaluate the effect of cigarette smoking-toothbrushing-cycling (CSTC) with whitening toothpastes on the roughness and optical behavior of bovine enamel for eight weeks. Thirty bovine dentin/enamel discs, 8.0 mm in diameter and 2.0 mm thick, were randomly divided into three groups according to the toothpastes: whitening (Colgate Luminous White - CW and Oral B 3D White - OW), and a non-whitening (Colgate - C). The roughness, color (CIE L*a*b* system), translucency and gloss were measured before and after the specimens were submitted to CSTC. The topography of the specimens was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. During the first week, the specimens were daily subjected to the consumption of 20 cigarettes and brushed (40 strokes/100 g) with the toothpastes' slurries. Thereafter, the CSTC was weekly applied in an accumulated model (140 cigarettes/280 strokes) for seven weeks. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD test, and paired-t test (α=0.05). The three toothpastes produced significant changes in roughness, color, translucency and gloss (p<0.05). After eight weeks, the roughness and the gloss produced by the three toothpastes were similar (p>0.05), while OW produced the lowest color change and the translucency of C was lower than that of CW (p<0.05). The three toothpastes produced a significant decrease in L* values and a significant increase in a* values after eight weeks (p<0.05). No significant difference in the b* coordinate was found for OW (p=0.13) There were topographic changes in the enamel surfaces. The whitening toothpastes increased the roughness, changed the topography and were not able to maintain the optical stability of enamel exposed over eight weeks.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleColorDental EnamelDentifricesMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningRandom AllocationReproducibility of ResultsSmokingSurface PropertiesTime FactorsTooth BleachingTooth Bleaching AgentsToothbrushingToothpastesDentifricesTooth Bleaching AgentsToothpastes

Identifiers

PMID29412362
PMCPMC5777417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.