Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29412183›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of pain2018

Research Design Characteristics of Published Pharmacologic Randomized Clinical Trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Pelvic Pain Conditions: An ACTTION Systematic Review.

Jennifer S Gewandter, Jenna Chaudari, Katarzyna B Iwan, Rachel Kitt, Sawsan As-Sanie, Gloria Bachmann, Quentin Clemens, H Henry Lai, Frank Tu, G Nicholas Verne and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gastrointestinal pain.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer S GewandterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. Electronic address: jennifer_gewandter@urmc.rochester.edu.
Jenna ChaudariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Katarzyna B IwanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Rachel KittDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Sawsan As-SanieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Gloria BachmannDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Quentin ClemensDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
H Henry LaiDepartments of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Frank TuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Health System Evanston and University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
G Nicholas VerneDepartment of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Katy VincentNuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ursula WesselmannDepartments of Anesthesiology, Neurology, and Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
QiQi ZhouNuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dennis C TurkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Robert H DworkinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Shannon M SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Oxford · GBNorthShore University HealthSystem · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTulane University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) Public-Private PartnershipU01FD005936 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DWORKIN, ROBERT H · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Analgesic Clinical Trial Innovations,Opportunities,and Networks(ACTION)U01FD004187 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DWORKIN, ROBERT H · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
FDA HHS U01 FD004187FDA HHS U01 FD005936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain conditions occurring in the lower abdomen and pelvis are common, often challenging to manage, and can negatively affect health-related quality of life. Methodological challenges in designing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for these conditions likely contributes to the limited number of available treatments. The goal of this systematic review of RCTs of pharmacologic treatments for irritable bowel syndrome and 3 common chronic pelvic pain conditions are to: 1) summarize the primary end points and entry criteria, and 2) evaluate the clarity of reporting of important methodological details. In total, 127 RCTs were included in the analysis. The most common inclusion criteria were a minimum pain duration (81%), fulfilling an established diagnostic criteria (61%), and reporting a minimum pain intensity (42%). Primary end points were identified for only 57% of trials. These end points, summarized in this article, were highly variable. The results of this systematic review can be used to inform future research to optimize the entry criteria and outcome measures for pain conditions occurring in the lower abdomen and pelvis, to increase transparency in reporting to allow for proper interpretation of RCT results for clinical and policy applications, and to facilitate the aggregation of data in meta-analyses. PERSPECTIVE: This article summarizes entry criteria and outcome measures and the clarity of reporting of these important design features in RCTs of irritable bowel syndrome and 3 common chronic pelvic pain conditions. These results can be used to improve design of future trials of these largely unaddressed pain conditions.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromePelvic PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Designbladder pain syndromechronic pelvic pain syndromechronic prostatitisInterstitial cystitisrandomized clinical trial reportingvulvodynia

Identifiers

PMID29412183
PMCPMC6026036
OpenAlexW2791241256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.