Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411552›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2018

Therapeutic Effect of Omalizumab in Severe Asthma: A Real-World Study in Korea.

Ji Ho Lee, Hyun Young Lee, Chang Gyu Jung, Ga Young Ban, Yoo Seob Shin, Young Min Ye, Dong Ho Nahm, Hae Sim Park

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sputum immunoglobulin E levels correlate with eosinophilic airway regardless of atopy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Is Omalizumab a Problem-Solving Remedy in Severe Asthma?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ji Ho Lee *Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Hyun Young Lee *Department of Statistics, Clinical Trial Center, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea.
Chang Gyu JungDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Ga Young BanDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Yoo Seob ShinDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Young Min YeDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Dong Ho NahmDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Hae Sim ParkDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. hspark@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-0303
Ajou University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOmalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody, has proved to be effective for the treatment of severe asthma. However, there is no direct evidence of effectiveness of omalizumab in Korean patients with severe asthma. We sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in Korean adult patients suffering from severe asthma and to identify predictors of favorable response.

methodsA retrospective analysis of electrical medical records was performed on severe allergic asthmatic patients with omalizumab treatment group (OT group) for more than 6 months between March 2008 and February 2016. Propensity score matching was applied to define the standardized treatment control group (STC group) treated without omalizumab. Asthma-related outcomes were compared between the 2 groups, and analyzed before and after omalizumab use in the OT group. Responders to treatment were defined as patients showing >50% reduction in asthma exacerbations and/or systemic steroid requirement during the outcome period.

resultsOne hundred twenty-four patients with severe asthma (62 in the OT group; 62 in the STC group) were enrolled in the study. Proportion of patients having the reduction of asthma exacerbation (53.2% vs 35.5%, P=0.015) and the rate of responders (67.7% vs 41.9%, P=0.007) were significantly higher in the OT group than in the STC group. Significant reductions were noted in asthma exacerbation (P=0.006), hospitalization (P=0.009), hospitalization days (P=0.006), systemic corticosteroid requirements (P=0.027), and sputum eosinophil count (P=0.031) in OT group compared with STC group. There were no significant differences in changes of forced expiratory volume in the 1 second (FEV1) levels between the 2 groups. No predictors of responders were found for omalizumab treatment.

conclusionsOmalizumab can reduce exacerbations/hospitalization/systemic steroid burst in Korean adult patients with severe asthma.

Indexed as

asthma exacerbationOmalizumabsevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID29411552
PMCPMC5809760
OpenAlexW2784312422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.