Observational studyDrug safety2018
A Multi-hospital Before-After Observational Study Using a Point-Prevalence Approach with an Infusion Safety Intervention Bundle to Reduce Intravenous Medication Administration Errors.
Observational study in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02359734 (A National Study of Intravenous Medication Errors), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A National Study of Intravenous Medication Errors: Understanding How to Improve Intravenous Safety With Smart Pumps
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intravenous Medication Administration Safety with Smart Infusion Pumps in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study.Drug safety · 2024Observational
- Attributes of errors, facilitators, and barriers related to rate control of IV medications: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Get Smart, Canada: Exploring Smart Pump Implementation, Management, and Compliance with Standards through a Nationwide Survey.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2023Article
- A qualitative analysis of intravenous smart pump usability.Nursing open · 2022Article
- The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- The impact of a novel medication scanner on administration errors in the hospital setting: a before and after feasibility study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Nurse and Pharmacist Knowledge of Intravenous Smart Pump System Setup Requirements.Biomedical instrumentation & technology · 2021Article
- Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety.Drug safety · 2019Article
- Reducing errors in the administration of medication with infusion pumps in the intensive care department: A lean approach.SAGE open medicine · 2019Article
- Independent Double-check of Infusion Pump Programming: An Anesthesia Improvement Effort to Reduce harm.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe previously found a high rate of errors in the administration of intravenous medications using smart infusion pumps. OBJECTIVES/
designAn infusion safety intervention bundle was developed in response to the high rate of identified errors. A before-after observational study with a prospective point-prevalence approach was conducted in nine hospitals to measure the preliminary effects of the intervention.
main outcome measuresPrimary outcome measures were overall errors and medication errors, with the secondary outcome defined as potentially harmful error rates.
resultsWe assessed a total of 418 patients with 972 medication administrations in the pre-intervention period and 422 patients with 1059 medication administrations in the post-intervention period. The overall error rate fell from 146 to 123 per 100 medication administrations (p < 0.0001), and the medication error rate also decreased from 39 to 29 per 100 medication administrations (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant change in the potentially harmful error rate (from 0.5 to 0.8 per 100 medication administrations, p = 0.37). An intervention component aiming to reduce labeling-not-completed errors was effective in reducing targeted error rates, but other components of the intervention bundle did not show significant improvement in the targeted errors.
conclusionDevelopment and implementation of the intervention bundle was successful at reducing overall and medication error rates, but some errors remained and the potentially harmful error rate did not change. The error-rate reductions were not always correlated with the specific individual interventions. Further investigation is needed to identify the best strategies to reduce the remaining errors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02359734.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29411338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.