Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411329›Full record

ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2018

Geriatricians and the older emergency general surgical patient: proactive assessment and patient centred interventions. Salford-POP-GS.

Arturo Vilches-Moraga, Jenny Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of the clinical frailty score (CFS) to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) risk calculator in all patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  8. Challenges in Geriatric Oncology-A Surgeon's Perspective.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arturo Vilches-MoragaFaculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. arturo.vilches-moraga@srft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-2066
Jenny FoxSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing numbers of older patients require Emergency admission under General Surgery (EGS). This is a group of heterogeneous and often complex individuals with varying degrees of multimorbidity, polypharmacy, functional, mobility and cognitive impairment. Our article describes the benefits of comprehensive assessment coupled with patient-centred multiprofessional interventions and timely discharge planning. We discuss diverse service models and describe our experience in the planning, development and consolidation of a perioperative service for older EGS patients.

Indexed as

EmergenciesGeriatric AssessmentGeriatriciansPatient-Centered CareSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedFrailtyHumansPerioperative CareComprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)Emergency general surgery (EGS)FrailtyMultidisciplinaryOlderPerioperative Care of Older Persons (POPS)

Identifiers

PMID29411329
PMCPMC5856886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.