Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411227›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2018

Discordance, Disclosure and Normative Gender Roles: Barriers to Couple Testing Within a Community-Level HIV Self-Testing Intervention in Urban Blantyre, Malawi.

Moses Kelly Kumwenda, Elizabeth Lucy Corbett, Jeremiah Chikovore, Mackwellings Phiri, Daniel Mwale, Augustine Talumba Choko, Marriot Nliwasa, Rodrick Sambakunsi, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Tore Jarl Gutteberg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Results of a Couples-Based Randomized Controlled Trial Aimed to Increase Testing for HIV.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Moses Kelly KumwendaBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre 3, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Malawi. kumwenda@gmail.com.
Elizabeth Lucy CorbettBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre 3, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Malawi.
Jeremiah ChikovoreHIV/AIDS, STIs and TB (HAST), Human Sciences Research Council, Private Bag X07, Dalbridge, 4014, South Africa.
Mackwellings PhiriBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre 3, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Malawi.
Daniel MwaleCollege of Medicine, Helse Nord TB Initiative, Blantyre 3, Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Malawi.
Augustine Talumba ChokoBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre 3, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Malawi.
Marriot NliwasaCollege of Medicine, Helse Nord TB Initiative, Blantyre 3, Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Malawi.
Rodrick SambakunsiBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre 3, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Malawi.
Miriam TaegtmeyerInternational Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Tore Jarl GuttebergDepartment of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, Postboks 6050, Langnes 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Alister MunthaliCentre for Social Research, Chancellor College, P.O. Box 280, Zomba, Malawi.
Nicola DesmondBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre 3, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A community-based HIV self-testing study in Blantyre, Malawi demonstrated that not all individuals living in couples tested with their partner. We describe factors dissuading individuals in couples from self-testing with their partner. Data were drawn from qualitative study exploring consequences of HIV self-testing within couples. In-depth interviews were conducted with 33 individuals living in couples who tested alone. Participants expressed fear of dealing with HIV-discordant relationships. Failure to self-test with a partner was correlated with gender, with more men than women overtly declining or unconsciously unable to have joint HIV self-test. Men feared exposure of infidelity and were often not available at home for economic reasons. Barriers to uptake of couple HIV self-testing seemed to be shaped by gendered dichotomies of social-relationships. To help achieve the first 90% of the UNAIDS 90:90:90 goals, it is important to overcome structural barriers to realise the full potential of HIV self-testing.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesDisclosureGender IdentityAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf CareSexual PartnersUrban PopulationCoupleDisclosureDiscordanceGenderSelf-test

Identifiers

PMID29411227
PMCPMC6097721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.