Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411204›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2018

Glucosamine use and risk of colorectal cancer: results from the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort.

Elizabeth D Kantor, Christina C Newton, Edward L Giovannucci, Marjorie L McCullough, Peter T Campbell, Eric J Jacobs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Glucosamine Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Results from UK Biobank.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Glucosamine and Chondroitin Supplements and Risk of Colorectal Adenoma and Serrated Polyp.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth D KantorDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA. kantore@mskcc.org.
Christina C NewtonEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Edward L GiovannucciDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Marjorie L McCulloughEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peter T CampbellEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eric J JacobsEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
American Cancer Society · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUse of glucosamine supplements has been associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in previous studies; however, information on this association remains limited.

methodsWe examined the association between glucosamine use and CRC risk among 113,067 men and women in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Glucosamine use was first reported in 2001 and updated every 2 years thereafter. Participants were followed from 2001 through June of 2011, during which time 1440 cases of CRC occurred.

resultsAs has been observed in prior studies, current use of glucosamine, modeled using a time-varying exposure, was associated with lower risk of CRC (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.97) compared to never use. However, for reasons that are unclear, this reduction in risk was observed for shorter-duration use (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.87 for current users with ≤ 2 years use) rather than longer-duration use (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.72-1.13 for current users with 3 to < 6 years of use; HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.76-1.29 for current users with ≥ 6 years of use).

conclusionsFurther research is needed to better understand the association between glucosamine use and risk of CRC, and how this association may vary by duration of use.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGlucosamineHumansMaleRiskGlucosamineChemopreventionColorectal cancerDietary supplementsEpidemiologyGlucosamine

Identifiers

PMID29411204
PMCPMC5870876
OpenAlexW2790175895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.