Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411114›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2018

Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.

Thomas J Buist, Ahmet Adiyaman, Jaap Jan J Smit, Anand R Ramdat Misier, Arif Elvan

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05400928 (The Effect and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05400928 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)-A Prospective Multicenter Single-arm Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTongji HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled144ConditionsParoxysmal Atrial FibrillationArmsPulsed Field Ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Second-generation cryoballoon vs. contact-force sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pulsed field ablation vs. thermal ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy, safety, and somatosensory comparison of pulsed-field ablation and thermal ablation: outcomes from a 2-year follow-up.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Comparative safety and effectiveness of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Global Research Progress on Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiology.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Pulsed-field- vs. cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: lessons from repeat procedures.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Advanced Electroanatomic Mapping: Current and Emerging Approaches.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas J BuistDepartment of cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Ahmet AdiyamanDepartment of cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jaap Jan J SmitDepartment of cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Anand R Ramdat MisierDepartment of cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Arif ElvanDepartment of cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. v.r.c.derks@isala.nl.
Isala · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to compare second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with regard to pulmonary vein reconnection and arrhythmia-free survival. METHODS AND

resultsAltogether, 269 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF undergoing PVI were included and randomly allocated to second-generation cryoballoon or contact-force point-by-point radiofrequency ablation. Median follow-up duration was 389 days (interquartile range 219-599). Mean age was 59 years (71% male); 136 patients underwent cryoballoon and 133 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation. Acute electrical PVI was 100% for both techniques. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in cryoballoon vs radiofrequency (166.5 vs 184.13 min P = 0.016). Complication rates were similar (6.0 vs 6.7%, P = 1.00). Single procedure freedom of atrial arrhythmias was significantly higher in cryoballoon as compared to radiofrequency (75.2 vs 57.4%, P = 0.013). In multivariate analysis, persistent AF, AF duration, and cryoballoon ablation were associated with freedom of atrial tachyarrhythmias. The number of repeat ablation procedures was significantly lower in the cryoballoon compared to radiofrequency (15.0 vs 24.3%, P = 0.045). At repeat ablation, pulmonary vein reconnection rate was significantly lower after cryoballoon as compared to radiofrequency ablation (36.8 vs 58.1%, P = 0.003).

conclusionsImproved arrhythmia-free survival and more durable pulmonary vein isolation is seen after PVI using second-generation cryoballoon as compared to contact-force radiofrequency, in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Complication rates for both ablation techniques are low.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationCryosurgeryDisease-Free SurvivalEchocardiography, TransesophagealEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart AtriaHeart Conduction SystemHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPulmonary VeinsAtrial fibrillationCryoballoonPulmonary vein isolationPulmonary vein reconnectionRadiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID29411114
OpenAlexW2787679517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.