Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411089›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2018

The NISTmAb Reference Material 8671 value assignment, homogeneity, and stability.

John E Schiel, Abby Turner, Trina Mouchahoir, Katharina Yandrofski, Srivalli Telikepalli, Jason King, Paul DeRose, Dean Ripple, Karen Phinney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A novelmAbs · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of glycans and hinge on dynamics in the IgG1 Fc.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Expression ofEPJ web of conferences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John E SchielNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, 9600 Gudelsky Dr, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. john.schiel@nist.gov.
Abby TurnerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, 9600 Gudelsky Dr, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Trina MouchahoirNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, 9600 Gudelsky Dr, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Katharina YandrofskiNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, 9600 Gudelsky Dr, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Srivalli TelikepalliNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Jason KingNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Paul DeRoseNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Dean RippleNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Karen PhinneyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NISTmAb Reference Material (RM) 8671 is intended to be an industry standard monoclonal antibody for pre-competitive harmonization of best practices and designing next generation characterization technologies for identity, quality, and stability testing. It must therefore embody the quality and characteristics of a typical biopharmaceutical product and be available long-term in a stable format with consistent product quality attributes. A stratified sampling and analysis plan using a series of qualified analytical and biophysical methods is described that assures RM 8671 meets these criteria. Results for the first three lots of RM 8671 highlight the consistency of material attributes with respect to size, charge, and identity. RM 8671 was verified to be homogeneous both within and between vialing lots, demonstrating the robustness of the lifecycle management plan. It was analyzed in concert with the in-house primary sample 8670 (PS 8670) to provide a historical link to this seminal material. RM 8671 was verified to be fit for its intended purpose as a technology innovation tool, external system suitability control, and cross-industry harmonization platform. Graphical abstract The NISTmAb Reference Material (RM) 8671 is intended to be an industry standard monoclonal antibody for pre-competitive harmonization of best practices and designing next generation characterization technologies for identity, quality, and stability testing.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsChromatography, GelDrug StabilityDynamic Light ScatteringElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansImmunoglobulin GMicroscopyModels, MolecularPeptide MappingProtein StabilityQuality ControlReference StandardsSpectrophotometry, UltravioletAntibodies, MonoclonalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsImmunoglobulin GBiopharmaceuticalBiosimilarBiotherapeuticMonoclonal antibodyNISTmAbReference MaterialSystem suitability

Identifiers

PMID29411089
PMCPMC5830482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.