Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410862›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

Specialized specialists and the narrow niche fallacy: a tale of scale-feeding fishes.

Matthew A Kolmann, Jonathan M Huie, Kory Evans, Adam P Summers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The behavioral origins of novelty: did increased aggression lead to scale-eating in pupfishes?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew A KolmannFriday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-2066
Jonathan M HuieSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1122 NE Boat St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Kory EvansCollege of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN, USA.
Adam P SummersFriday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although rare within the context of 30 000 species of extant fishes, scale-feeding as an ecological strategy has evolved repeatedly across the teleost tree of life. Scale-feeding (lepidophagous) fishes are diverse in terms of their ecology, behaviour, and specialized morphologies for grazing on scales and mucus of sympatric species. Despite this diversity, the underlying ontogenetic changes in functional and biomechanical properties of associated feeding morphologies in lepidophagous fishes are less understood. We examined the ontogeny of feeding mechanics in two evolutionary lineages of scale-feeding fishes:

Indexed as

Characiformesgrazinglepidophagymucophagypaedomorphosispterygophagy

Identifiers

PMID29410862
PMCPMC5792939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.