Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410822›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

Frequency doubling by active

James F C Windmill, Joseph C Jackson, Victoria G Pook, Daniel Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A mosquito-inspired theoretical framework for acoustic signal detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory systems across mosquito species.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  4. Material stiffness variation in mosquito antennae.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  5. Frequency doubling by activeRoyal Society open science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James F C WindmillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4878-349X
Joseph C JacksonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.
Victoria G PookSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.
Daniel RobertSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across vertebrate and invertebrate species, nonlinear active mechanisms are employed to increase the sensitivity and acuity of hearing. In mosquitoes, the antennal hearing organs are known to use active force feedback to enhance auditory acuity to female generated sounds. This sophisticated form of signal processing involves active nonlinear events that are proposed to rely on the motile properties of mechanoreceptor neurons. The fundamental physical mechanism for active auditory mechanics is theorized to rely on a synchronization of motile neurons, with a characteristic frequency doubling of the force generated by an ensemble of motile mechanoreceptors. There is however no direct biomechanical evidence at the mechanoreceptor level, hindering further understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of sensitive hearing. Here, using

Indexed as

atomic force microscopymosquitomotilitynanomechanicsneurons

Identifiers

PMID29410822
PMCPMC5792899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.