Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410786›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2018

The effect of mere measurement from a cardiovascular examination program on physical activity and sedentary time in an adult population.

Lisa Voigt, Sophie Baumann, Antje Ullrich, Franziska Weymar, Ulrich John, Sabina Ulbricht

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02990039 (A Tailored Feasibility Study to Increase Physical Activity and to Reduce Sedentary Time), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02990039 nacompletednot on this map

A Tailored Feasibility Study to Increase Physical Activity and to Reduce Sedentary Time

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medicine GreifswaldRan2015 to 2016Enrolled176ConditionsCardiovascular Risk FactorArmsCounseling letter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa Voigt1Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1650-4284
Sophie Baumann1Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Antje Ullrich1Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Franziska Weymar1Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Ulrich John1Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Sabina Ulbricht1Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) by self-report or device as well as assessing related health factors may alter those behaviors. Thus, in intervention trials assessments may bias intervention effects. The aim of our study was to examine whether leisure-time PA, transport-related PA, and overall ST measured via self-report vary after assessments and whether a brief tailored letter intervention has an additional effect.

methodsAmong a sample of subjects with no history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular intervention, a number of 175 individuals participated in a study comprising multiple repeated assessments. Of those, 153 were analyzed (mean age 54.5 years, standard deviation = 6.2; 64% women). At baseline, participants attended a cardiovascular examination (standardized measurement of blood pressure and waist circumference, blood sample taking) and wore an accelerometer for seven days. At baseline and after 1, 6, and 12 months, participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. A random subsample received a tailored counseling letter intervention at month 1, 3, and 4. Changes in PA and ST from baseline to 12-month follow-up were analyzed using random-effects modelling.

resultsFrom baseline to 1-month assessment, leisure-time PA did not change (Incidence rate ratio = 1.13,

conclusionsResults suggest an effect of measurements on PA and ST. Data of random-effects modelling results revealed an increase of transport-related PA after baseline to 1-month assessment. Decreases in overall ST may result from repeated assessments. A brief tailored letter intervention seemed to have no additional effect. Thus, measurement effects should be considered when planning intervention studies and interpreting intervention effects.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02990039. Registered 7 December 2016. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Brief interventionMeasurement reactivityQuestion-behavior effectRandom-effects modellingResearch participation

Identifiers

PMID29410786
PMCPMC5781312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.