ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2018
Comparative analysis of Salivette® and paraffin gum preparations for establishment of a metaproteomics analysis pipeline for stimulated human saliva.
Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 during Periodontitis and Cardiovascular Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Trial
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Oral Meta-Omics Analysis-What We Know and What We Don't.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Biomarker Levels in e-Cigarette Smokers and Conventional Smokers.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2021Article
- Metaproteomics analysis of microbial diversity of human saliva and tongue dorsum in young healthy individuals.Journal of oral microbiology · 2019Article
- Determining bacterial and host contributions to the human salivary metabolome.Journal of oral microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The value of saliva as a diagnostic tool can be increased by taxonomic and functional analyses of the microbiota as recently demonstrated. In this proof-of-principle study, we compare two collection methods (Salivette® (SV) and paraffin gum (PG)) for stimulated saliva from five healthy participants and present a workflow including PG preparation which is suitable for metaproteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.