Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410760›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2017

Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique.

Luis-Antonio Aguirre-Zorzano, Ana M García-De La Fuente, Ruth Estefanía-Fresco, Xabier Marichalar-Mendía

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03741062 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Er:YAG Photobiomodulation Therapy on Wound Healing of Human Palatal Mucosa After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled11ConditionsHealing Surgical Wounds, Pain MeasurementArmsJ. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser, Control
NCT06114394 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of the Complications in Palatal Graft Harvesting With the UPV/EHU Technique vs. Single Incision Technique.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)Ran2023 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsCicatrizationArmsUPV/EHU technique (Aguirre-Zorzano et al 2017), Single incision technique (Huerzeler & Weng 1999)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis-Antonio Aguirre-ZorzanoProfessor in Periodontics. Department of Stomatology II. Director of the Master's Degree on Periodontics and Osteointegration. (UPV/EHU).
Ana M García-De La FuenteAssistant Professor. Department of Stomatology II. Master's Degree on Periodontics and Osteointegration. (UPV/EHU).
Ruth Estefanía-FrescoPhD in Dentistry. Associate Teacher. Department of Stomatology II. Master's Degree on Periodontics and Osteointegration. (UPV/EHU).
Xabier Marichalar-MendíaPh in Biology. Master´s Degree on Oral Pathology (UPV/EHU). Department of Stomatology II. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
University of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConnective tissue graft (CTG) is considered as the gold standard for the treatment of gingival recessions (GR). There are few studies assessing the complications that can arise in the donor site when harvesting a connective tissue graft (CTG) and how the harvesting technique can influence those complications. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective clinical study was carried out in order to compare the complications observed in 40 patients with Miller class I, II and III GR ≥ 3 mm, after using the trap-door technique (TD) in the control group and a newly described technique, the "UPV/EHU technique", in the test group. Patients were consecutively allocated to each treatment group. Patients were monitored 14 days after surgery in order to evaluate post-operative complications in the donor site: presence of pain (P), bleeding (B), infection (I) and necrosis > 30%.

resultsAlthough morbidity was observed in both groups, it was less important in the test group (no pain and minimal pain in 30% and 35% of the cases, respectively, and absence of bleeding or infection and necrosis >30% in only 5% of the cases).

conclusionsWithin the limits of this study, this newly described "UPV/EHU technique" should be considered as a treatment option when harvesting a CTG, with minimal morbidity for patients.

Identifiers

PMID29410760
PMCPMC5794122
OpenAlexW2775716562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.