Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410711›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2018

Serum miR-122-5p and miR-206 expression: non-invasive prognostic biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma.

Frauke G Heinemann, Yuri Tolkach, Mario Deng, Doris Schmidt, Sven Perner, Glen Kristiansen, Stefan C Müller, Jörg Ellinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frauke G Heinemann1Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Yuri Tolkach2Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mario Deng3Institute of Pathology, Campus Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Doris Schmidt1Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sven Perner3Institute of Pathology, Campus Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Glen Kristiansen2Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan C Müller1Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jörg Ellinger1Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7526-0857
University Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNA) play a relevant role in carcinogenesis, cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis. Thus, they can serve as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers. The knowledge on circulating miRNAs for clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) is limited. Our study was designed to identify novel biomarkers for ccRCC patients. Results: The serum small RNA expression profile was determined in 18 ccRCC and 8 patients with benign renal tumors (BRT) using small RNA sequencing. We detected 29 differentially expressed miRNAs (17 upregulated and 12 downregulated in ccRCC) in the expression profiling cohort. Based on the expression levels, we next validated serum miR-122-5p, miR-193a-5p, and miR-206 levels in an independent cohort (68 ccRCC, 47 BRT, and 28 healthy individuals) using quantitative real-time PCR. Serum expression levels of miR-122-5p and miR-206 were significantly decreased in ccRCC compared to healthy individuals. Both miRNAs were circulating at similar levels in ccRCC and BRT patients. miR-193a-5p expression levels were not different within the study cohort. High serum miR-122-5p and miR-206 levels were associated with adverse clinicopathological parameters: miR-122-5p levels were correlated with metastatic RCC and grade, and miR-206 with pT-stage and metastasis. Furthermore, high miR-122-5p and miR-206 serum levels were associated with a shorter period of progression-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival in patients with ccRCC. Conclusion: We identified serum miR-122-5p and miR-206 as novel non-invasive prognostic biomarkers for patients with ccRCC.

Indexed as

Up-RegulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN122 microRNA, humanMIRN206 microRNA, humanBiomarkermiR-122-5pmiR-206Renal cell carcinomaSerum

Identifiers

PMID29410711
PMCPMC5781339
OpenAlexW2791597306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.