ArticleGenomics insights2018
Application of the GRADE Approach in the Development of Guidelines and Recommendations in Genomic Medicine.
Article in Genomics insights, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A European Academy of Neurology guideline on medical management issues in dementia.European journal of neurology · 2020Guideline
- Systematic Review: Effect of Health Education Intervention on Improving Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Adolescents on Malnutrition.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- The Buzz Surrounding Precision Medicine: The Imperative of Incorporating It into Evidence-Based Medical Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Prioritization of Variants for Investigation of Genotype-Directed Nutrition in Human Superpopulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A great deal of ambiguity exists in the development of guidelines for genomic applications used in clinical practice. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach has the potential to be applied in the guidelines and recommendations development process in genomics. Here, we discuss whether and how GRADE can be applied to address the challenges posed by the evidence-based guidelines and recommendations development process in genomics. To see how GRADE can complement to the current guidelines development in genomics, we compare and contrast GRADE with other approaches. GRADE differed from other methods by incorporating patient values and preferences and balance of consequences. We conclude that the groups trying to implement genomics into practice may gleam more information from applying the GRADE framework. However, it is not clear yet whether GRADE can address the issue of timeliness in terms of the differences between the time required for guidelines development and the rapid pace of genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.