Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

In silico clinical trials for pediatric orphan diseases.

A Carlier, A Vasilevich, M Marechal, J de Boer, L Geris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tackling rare diseases: Clinical trials on chips.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A CarlierBiomechanics Section, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300C, PB 2419, 3000 Leuven, Belgium and Biomechanics Research Unit, University of Liège, Chemin des Chevreuils 1 - BAT 52/3, 4000, Liège 1, Belgium.
A VasilevichMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M MarechalPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, O&N 1, Herestraat 49, PB 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
J de BoerMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
L GerisBiomechanics Section, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300C, PB 2419, 3000 Leuven, Belgium and Biomechanics Research Unit, University of Liège, Chemin des Chevreuils 1 - BAT 52/3, 4000, Liège 1, Belgium. liesbet.geris@ulg.ac.be.
KU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

European Research Council 279100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date poor treatment options are available for patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT), a pediatric orphan disease. In this study we have performed an in silico clinical trial on 200 virtual subjects, generated from a previously established model of murine bone regeneration, to tackle the challenges associated with the small, pediatric patient population. Each virtual subject was simulated to receive no treatment and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) treatment. We have shown that the degree of severity of CPT is significantly reduced with BMP treatment, although the effect is highly subject-specific. Using machine learning techniques we were also able to stratify the virtual subject population in adverse responders, non-responders, responders and asymptomatic. In summary, this study shows the potential of in silico medicine technologies as well as their implications for other orphan diseases.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAdolescentBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBone Morphogenetic ProteinsBone RegenerationCase-Control StudiesChildClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMalePseudarthrosisRare DiseasesTibiaBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBone Morphogenetic Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29410461
PMCPMC5802824
OpenAlexW2805754304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.