Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410235›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2018

Variation in thermally induced taste response across thermal tasters.

Martha Skinner, Sally Eldeghaidy, Rebecca Ford, Timo Giesbrecht, Anna Thomas, Susan Francis, Joanne Hort

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Can taste be ergogenic?European journal of nutrition · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martha SkinnerSensory Science Centre, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5NT, UK; Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy University of Nottingham, UK NG7 2RD.
Sally EldeghaidySir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy University of Nottingham, UK NG7 2RD.
Rebecca FordSensory Science Centre, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5NT, UK.
Timo GiesbrechtUnilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, Wirral, Merseyside CH63 3JW, UK.
Anna ThomasUnilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, Wirral, Merseyside CH63 3JW, UK.
Susan FrancisSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy University of Nottingham, UK NG7 2RD.
Joanne HortSensory Science Centre, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5NT, UK; Riddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. Electronic address: j.hort@massey.ac.nz.
University of Nottingham · GBUnilever (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L000458/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal tasters (TTs) perceive thermally induced taste (thermal taste) sensations when the tongue is stimulated with temperature in the absence of gustatory stimuli, while thermal non tasters (TnTs) only perceive temperature. This is the first study to explore detailed differences in thermal taste responses across TTs. Using thermal taster status phenotyping, 37 TTs were recruited, and the temporal characteristics of thermal taste responses collected during repeat exposure to temperature stimulation. Phenotyping found sweet most frequently reported during warming stimulation, and bitter and sour when cooling, but a range of other sensations were stated. The taste quality, intensity, and number of tastes reported greatly varied. Furthermore, the temperature range when thermal taste was perceived differed across TTs and taste qualities, with some TTs perceiving a taste for a small temperature range, and others the whole trial. The onset of thermal sweet taste ranged between 22 and 38°C during temperature increase. This supports the hypothesis that TRPM5 may be involved in thermal sweet taste perception as TRPM5 is temperature activated between 15 and 35°C, and involved in sweet taste transduction. These findings also raised questions concerning the phenotyping protocol and classification currently used, thus indicating the need to review practices for future testing. This study has highlighted the hitherto unknown variation that exists in thermal taste response across TTs, provides some insights into possible mechanisms, and importantly emphasises the need for more research into this sensory phenomenon.

Indexed as

TemperatureAdultCorrelation of DataFemaleHumansMalePhysical StimulationPrincipal Component AnalysisPsychophysicsTasteTaste PerceptionThermosensingYoung AdultTaste phenotypeThermal tasteThermal tasterTRPM5

Identifiers

PMID29410235
PMCPMC5861308
OpenAlexW2791415471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.