Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410107›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2018

Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy.

Stefano Uccella, Mario Malzoni, Antonella Cromi, Renato Seracchioli, Giuseppe Ciravolo, Francesco Fanfani, Fevzi Shakir, Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Francesco Legge, Roberto Berretta and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05833204 (Barbed Versus Standard Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05833204 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Barbed Versus Standard Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversita di VeronaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,614ConditionsVaginal Cuff ComplicationsArmsLaparoscopic colporrhaphy with 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture, Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with standard 0-caliber absorbable suture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Risk Assessment Model for Complications in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano UccellaDepartment of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Rome, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy. Electronic address: stefucc@libero.it.
Mario MalzoniEndoscopica Malzoni-Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy.
Antonella CromiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Renato SeracchioliMinimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe CiravoloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Francesco FanfaniDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Fevzi ShakirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Salvatore Gueli AllettiDepartment of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Rome, Italy.
Francesco LeggeDivision of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
Roberto BerrettaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giacomo CorradoDepartment of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Rome, Italy.
Lucia CasarellaEndoscopica Malzoni-Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy.
Paolo DonariniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Margherita ZanelloMinimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Emanuele PerroneGynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Baldo GisoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Enrico VizzaDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITOspedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli · ITThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal cuff dehiscence following hysterectomy is considered an infrequent but potentially devastating complication. Different possible techniques for cuff closure have been proposed to reduce this threatening adverse event.

objectiveThe aim of the present randomized study was to compare laparoscopic and transvaginal suture of the vaginal vault at the end of a total laparoscopic hysterectomy, in terms of incidence of vaginal dehiscence and vaginal cuff complications. Factors associated with vaginal dehiscence were also analyzed. This article presents the results of the interim analysis of the trial. STUDY

designPatients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications were randomized at the time of colpotomy to receive vaginal closure through transvaginal vs laparoscopic approach using a 1:1 ratio. Allocation concealment was obtained using a password-protected randomization database. Monopolar energy for colpotomy was set at 60W. Vaginal closure was performed with a single-layer running braided and coated 0-polyglactin suture. In all cases an attempt was performed to include the posterior peritoneum in the suture. Laparoscopic knots were tied intracorporeally. All patients were scheduled for a postoperative follow-up visit 3 months after surgery, to detect possible vaginal cuff complications. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of vaginal cuff dehiscence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

resultsAfter enrollment of 1408 patients, a prespecified interim analysis was conducted. Thirteen (0.9%) women did not undergo the postoperative assessment and were excluded. Baseline characteristics of the 1395 patients included (695 in the transvaginal group and 700 in the laparoscopic group) were similar between groups. Patients in the transvaginal group had a significantly higher incidence of vaginal dehiscence (2.7% vs 1%; odds ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-6.63; P = .01) and of any cuff complication (9.8% vs 4.7%; odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-3.37; P = .0003). Based on these findings, the data monitoring committee recommended that the trial be terminated early. After multivariable analysis, transvaginal closure of the vault was independently associated with a higher incidence of vaginal dehiscence and any vaginal complication; premenopausal status and smoking habit were independently associated with a higher risk of dehiscence.

conclusionLaparoscopic closure of the vaginal cuff at the end of total laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a significant reduction of vaginal dehiscence, any cuff complication, vaginal bleeding, vaginal cuff hematoma, postoperative infection, need for vaginal resuture, and reintervention.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansHysterectomyIncidenceLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Wound DehiscenceSuturesTreatment OutcomeUterine HemorrhageVaginaeviscerationlaparoscopic knotslaparoscopyrisk factorstotal laparoscopic hysterectomytransvaginal suturevaginal cuff complicationsvaginal cuff dehiscence

Identifiers

PMID29410107
OpenAlexW2790556138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.