Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29410011›Full record

ArticleProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry2018

Presumed structural and functional neural recovery after long-term abstinence from cocaine in male military veterans.

Qinghua He, Xiaolu Huang, Ofir Turel, Marya Schulte, David Huang, April Thames, Antoine Bechara, Yih-Ing Hser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Neurobehavioral Approach to Addiction: Implications for the Opioid Epidemic and the Psychology of Addiction.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qinghua HeFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China; Brain and Creativity Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Southwest University Branch, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment Toward Basic Education Quality, Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Chongqing Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: heqinghua@swu.edu.cn.
Xiaolu HuangFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Ofir TurelBrain and Creativity Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States.
Marya SchulteIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
David HuangIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
April ThamesIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Antoine BecharaBrain and Creativity Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Yih-Ing HserIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · USSouthwest University · CN

Funding

STATISTICAL SUPPORT/DATA MANAGEMENT COREP30DA016383 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HSER, YIH-ING · 2005 to 2015
$8.6M
Neurocognitive Mechanisms and Recovery from AddictionR03DA032542 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HSER, YIH-ING · 2012 to 2012
$221k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA016383NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA032542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cumulative evidence suggests that cocaine use could alter the structure and function of different brain systems. However, the extent to which the altered brain structure and function possibly recover over time after cocaine abstinence remains less clear. The present study examines 39 male military veterans with different stages of cocaine addiction and long-term abstinence (from 1 year up to 30 years) and evaluates plausible changes in brain structure and function of specific brain regions that sub-serve addictions. These include the striatum that is involved in cocaine reward; the lateral prefrontal cortex (especially the dorsolateral PFC) that plays a major role in inhibitory control; the insula, which has been implicated in craving; and the medial orbitofrontal (OFC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) shown to play key roles in foresight and decision-making. The results suggest that there are differences in both brain structure (gray matter volume, GMV) and function between cocaine USERS and CONTROLS, with USERS showing plausible relative strengthening in neural systems for processing reward and craving, and relative weakening in neural systems involved in inhibitory control and decision-making. Examination of possible neural changes after abstinence suggests that presumed recovery occurs mostly in neural systems related to reward, craving, and inhibitory control, but to a lesser extent in neural systems related to decision-making. Given the limitations of the data in terms of a small sample size, as well as the lack of certainty about occasional use in the abstinent group, these results may be considered as preliminary. However, they are compelling in that they suggest that male military veterans cocaine USERS are indefinitely at a higher risk compared to CONTROLS for making lapses in judgment and decision-making leading to possible relapse, if reward salience and craving become more intense. Understanding the neurobiology of long-term cocaine abstinence in vulnerable populations and beyond could help devising better therapeutic strategies that prevent relapse.

Indexed as

VeteransBrainCase-Control StudiesCocaine-Related DisordersFunctional NeuroimagingGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingRecovery of FunctionAbstinenceCocaine addictionfMRIFunctional connectivityVBM

Identifiers

PMID29410011
PMCPMC5880688
OpenAlexW2793350897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.