Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29409553›Full record

ArticleCardiology in the young2018

Diagnostic errors in paediatric cardiac intensive care.

Priya N Bhat, John M Costello, Ranjit Aiyagari, Paul J Sharek, Claudia A Algaze, Mjaye L Mazwi, Stephen J Roth, Andrew Y Shin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology in the young, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Factors Associated With Diagnostic Error on Admission to a PICU: A Pilot Study.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priya N Bhat1Department of Pediatrics,Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri,USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-8818
John M Costello2Department of Pediatrics,Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,Chicago,Illinois,USA.
Ranjit Aiyagari3Department of Pediatrics,Division of Pediatric Cardiology,University of Michigan School of Medicine,Ann Arbor,Michigan,USA.
Paul J Sharek4Department of Pediatrics,Division of Hospitalist Medicine,Stanford University School of Medicine,Palo Alto,California,USA.
Claudia A Algaze5Department of Pediatrics,Division of Pediatric Cardiology,Stanford University School of Medicine,Palo Alto,California,USA.
Mjaye L Mazwi2Department of Pediatrics,Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,Chicago,Illinois,USA.
Stephen J Roth5Department of Pediatrics,Division of Pediatric Cardiology,Stanford University School of Medicine,Palo Alto,California,USA.
Andrew Y Shin4Department of Pediatrics,Division of Hospitalist Medicine,Stanford University School of Medicine,Palo Alto,California,USA.

Funding

RESEARCH METHODS IN PEDIATRICS HEART DISEASET32HL007572 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Sarah D DE FERRANTI, Jane W. Newburger · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionDiagnostic errors cause significant patient harm and increase costs. Data characterising such errors in the paediatric cardiac intensive care population are limited. We sought to understand the perceived frequency and types of diagnostic errors in the paediatric cardiac ICU.

methodsPaediatric cardiac ICU practitioners including attending and trainee physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and registered nurses at three North American tertiary cardiac centres were surveyed between October 2014 and January 2015.

resultsThe response rate was 46% (N=200). Most respondents (81%) perceived that diagnostic errors harm patients more than five times per year. More than half (65%) reported that errors permanently harm patients, and up to 18% perceived that diagnostic errors contributed to death or severe permanent harm more than five times per year. Medication side effects and psychiatric conditions were thought to be most commonly misdiagnosed. Physician groups also ranked pulmonary overcirculation and viral illness to be commonly misdiagnosed as bacterial illness. Inadequate care coordination, data assessment, and high clinician workload were cited as contributory factors. Delayed diagnostic studies and interventions related to the severity of the patient's condition were thought to be the most commonly reported process breakdowns. All surveyed groups ranked improving teamwork and feedback pathways as strategies to explore for preventing future diagnostic errors.

conclusionsPaediatric cardiac intensive care practitioners perceive that diagnostic errors causing permanent harm are common and associated more with systematic and process breakdowns than with cognitive limitations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceRisk AssessmentCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic ErrorsHealth Care SurveysHeart DiseasesHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMorbidityNorth AmericaPediatricsRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic errorspaediatric intensive care

Identifiers

PMID29409553
PMCPMC7271069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.