Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29409543›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

Effects of predation stress and food ration on perch gut microbiota.

Yinghua Zha, Alexander Eiler, Frank Johansson, Richard Svanbäck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gut microbiome resilience of green-lipped mussels, Perna canaliculus, to starvation.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. High-altitude environments enhance the ability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yinghua ZhaDepartment of Ecology and Genetics/Limnology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. yinghua.zha@ebc.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-0784
Alexander EilerDepartment of Ecology and Genetics/Limnology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Frank JohanssonDepartment of Ecology and Genetics/Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Richard SvanbäckDepartment of Ecology and Genetics/Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning ICA10-0015Vetenskapsrådet VR - 2011-05646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGut microbiota provide functions of importance to influence hosts' food digestion, metabolism, and protection against pathogens. Factors that affect the composition and functions of gut microbial communities are well studied in humans and other animals; however, we have limited knowledge of how natural food web factors such as stress from predators and food resource rations could affect hosts' gut microbiota and how it interacts with host sex. In this study, we designed a two-factorial experiment exposing perch (Perca fluviatilis) to a predator (pike, Esox lucius), and different food ratios, to examine the compositional and functional changes of perch gut microbiota based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. We also investigated if those changes are host sex dependent.

resultsWe showed that overall gut microbiota composition among individual perch significantly responded to food ration and predator presence. We found that species richness decreased with predator presence, and we identified 23 taxa from a diverse set of phyla that were over-represented when a predator was present. For example, Fusobacteria increased both at the lowest food ration and at predation stress conditions, suggesting that Fusobacteria are favored by stressful situations for the host. In concordance, both food ration and predation stress seemed to influence the metabolic repertoire of the gut microbiota, such as biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, metabolism of cofactors, and vitamins. In addition, the identified interaction between food ration and sex emphasizes sex-specific responses to diet quantity in gut microbiota.

conclusionsCollectively, our findings emphasize an alternative state in gut microbiota with responses to changes in natural food webs depending on host sex. The obtained knowledge from this study provided us with an important perspective on gut microbiota in a food web context.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEsocidaeFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMalePerchesPredatory BehaviorRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSecondary MetabolismSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAFood rationFreshwater fishGut microbial communitiesPredation stress

Identifiers

PMID29409543
PMCPMC5801810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.