Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29409538›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis.

Philipp Bernhardt, Wolfgang Kratzer, Julian Schmidberger, Tilmann Graeter, Beate Gruener, EMIL Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. [Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): a multisystemic disease beyond the liver].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. NAFLD in normal weight individuals.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp BernhardtDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang KratzerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. wolfgang.Kratzer@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Julian SchmidbergerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Tilmann GraeterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Beate GruenerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
EMIL Study Group
University Hospital Ulm · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GrK1041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSearch for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) < 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI > 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected.

resultsThere were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHematocritInsulin ResistanceAdultAgedCholesterolCholesterol, LDLFemaleFerritinsHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseObesityTriglyceridesCholesterolCholesterol, LDLFerritinsHemoglobinsTriglyceridesFerritinHaematocritHaemoglobinlean NAFLDMean corpuscular haemoglobin concentrationWaist-to-hip ratio

Identifiers

PMID29409538
PMCPMC5801753
OpenAlexW2802925982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.