Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29409513›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2018

Efficient differentially private learning improves drug sensitivity prediction.

Antti Honkela, Mrinal Das, Arttu Nieminen, Onur Dikmen, Samuel Kaski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential privacy in health research: A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antti HonkelaHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mrinal DasHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.
Arttu NieminenHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Onur DikmenHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Samuel KaskiHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland. samuel.kaski@aalto.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-1925-9154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsers of a personalised recommendation system face a dilemma: recommendations can be improved by learning from data, but only if other users are willing to share their private information. Good personalised predictions are vitally important in precision medicine, but genomic information on which the predictions are based is also particularly sensitive, as it directly identifies the patients and hence cannot easily be anonymised. Differential privacy has emerged as a potentially promising solution: privacy is considered sufficient if presence of individual patients cannot be distinguished. However, differentially private learning with current methods does not improve predictions with feasible data sizes and dimensionalities.

resultsWe show that useful predictors can be learned under powerful differential privacy guarantees, and even from moderately-sized data sets, by demonstrating significant improvements in the accuracy of private drug sensitivity prediction with a new robust private regression method. Our method matches the predictive accuracy of the state-of-the-art non-private lasso regression using only 4x more samples under relatively strong differential privacy guarantees. Good performance with limited data is achieved by limiting the sharing of private information by decreasing the dimensionality and by projecting outliers to fit tighter bounds, therefore needing to add less noise for equal privacy.

conclusionsThe proposed differentially private regression method combines theoretical appeal and asymptotic efficiency with good prediction accuracy even with moderate-sized data. As already the simple-to-implement method shows promise on the challenging genomic data, we anticipate rapid progress towards practical applications in many fields. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Zoltan Gaspari and David Kreil.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePrivacyDifferential privacyDrug sensitivity predictionLinear regressionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID29409513
PMCPMC5801888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.