Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29409470›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Identifying the social and environmental determinants of plague endemicity in Peru: insights from a case study in Ascope, La Libertad.

Ana Rivière-Cinnamond, Alain Santandreu, Anita Luján, Frederic Mertens, John Omar Espinoza, Yesenia Carpio, Johnny Bravo, Jean-Marc Gabastou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prevalence ofOpen life sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Human plague: An old scourge that needs new answers.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Rivière-CinnamondPan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), PAHO Health Emergencies Department (PHE), Los Pinos 251, Camacho La Molina, 12, Lima, Peru. rivierea@paho.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5183-2403
Alain SantandreuConsorcio por la Salud, Ambiente y Desarrollo (ECOSAD), Lima, Peru.
Anita LujánConsorcio por la Salud, Ambiente y Desarrollo (ECOSAD), Lima, Peru.
Frederic MertensCentro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
John Omar EspinozaConsorcio por la Salud, Ambiente y Desarrollo (ECOSAD), Lima, Peru.
Yesenia CarpioConsorcio por la Salud, Ambiente y Desarrollo (ECOSAD), Lima, Peru.
Johnny BravoConsorcio por la Salud, Ambiente y Desarrollo (ECOSAD), Lima, Peru.
Jean-Marc GabastouPan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), PAHO Health Emergencies Department (PHE), Los Pinos 251, Camacho La Molina, 12, Lima, Peru.
EsSALUD · PEPan American Health Organization (Cuba) · CUUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlague remains a public health problem in specific areas located in Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru. Its prevention and control encompasses adequate clinical management and timely laboratory diagnosis. However, understanding communities' interaction with its surrounding ecosystem as well as the differences between community members and institutional stakeholders regarding the root causes of plague might contribute to understand its endemicity. We aim at bridging the traditionally separate biological and social sciences by elucidating communities' risk perception and identifying knowledge gaps between communities and stakeholders. This approach has been used in other areas but never in understanding plague endemicity, nor applied in the Latin American plague context. The objectives were to identify (i) plague risk perception at community level, (ii) perceived social and environmental determinants of plague endemicity, and (iii) institutions that need to be involved and actions needed to be taken as proposed by stakeholders and community members. The study was performed in 2015 and took place in Ascope rural province, La Libertad Region, in Peru, where the study areas are surrounded by intensive private sugarcane production.

methodsWe propose using a multi-level discourse analysis. Community households were randomly selected (n = 68). Structured and semi-structured questionnaires were applied. A stakeholder analysis was used to identify policy makers (n = 34). In-depth interviews were performed, recorded and transcribed. Descriptive variables were analyzed with SPSS®. Answers were coded following variables adapted from the Commission on Social Determinants of Health and analyzed with the assistance of ATLAS.ti®.

resultsResults showed that risk perception was low within the community. Policy-makers identified agriculture and sugarcane production as the root cause while community answers ranked the hygiene situation as the main cause. Stakeholders first ranked governmental sectors (education, housing, agriculture and transport) and the community prioritized the health sector. Social surveillance and improving prevention and control were first cited by policy-makers and community members, respectively.

conclusionsThe determinants of plague endemicity identified by the two groups differed. Similarly, actions and sectors needed to be involved in solving the problem varied. The gaps in understanding plague root causes between these two groups might hinder the efficiency of current plague prevention and control strategies.

Indexed as

Endemic DiseasesEnvironmentSocial Determinants of HealthAdministrative PersonnelAdolescentAdultCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeruPlagueQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentComplex systemsPlaguePublic health policyQualitative methodsRisk perceptionsSocial and environmental determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID29409470
PMCPMC5801814
OpenAlexW2800223152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.