Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29409051›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Impact of genomic alterations on lapatinib treatment outcome and cell-free genomic landscape during HER2 therapy in HER2+ gastric cancer patients.

S T Kim, K C Banks, E Pectasides, S Y Kim, K Kim, R B Lanman, A Talasaz, J An, M G Choi, J H Lee and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Cancer discovery · 2019
    Trial
  6. Clinical impact of intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity on trastuzumab deruxtecan efficacy in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Pairwise analysis of plasma cell-free DNA before and after palliative second-line paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. HER-2 SMASH.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S T KimDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
K C BanksDepartment of Medical Affair, Guardant Health, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
E PectasidesDivision of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
S Y KimDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
K KimDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
R B LanmanDepartment of Medical Affair, Guardant Health, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
A TalasazDepartment of Medical Affair, Guardant Health, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
J AnSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
M G ChoiSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
J H LeeSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
T S SohnSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
J M BaeSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
S KimSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
S H ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J O ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Y S ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
H Y LimDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
N K D KimSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
W ParkSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
H LeeSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Division of Gastroenterolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
A J BassDivision of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
K KimPathology and Translational Genomics, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
W K KangDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J LeeDivision of Hematology-Oncolog, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: jyunlee@skku.edu.
Samsung Medical Center · KRBoston University · USGuardant (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To identify predictive markers for responders in lapatinib-treated patients and to demonstrate molecular changes during lapatinib treatment via cell-free genomics. Patients and methods: We prospectively evaluated the efficacy of combining lapatinib with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first line neoadjuvant therapy in patients with previously untreated, HER2-overexpressing advanced gastric cancer. A parallel biomarker study was conducted by simultaneously performing immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with tumor and blood samples. Results: Complete response was confirmed in 7/32 patients (21.8%), 2 of whom received radical surgery with pathologic-confirmed complete response. Fifteen partial responses (46.8%) were observed, resulting in a 68.6% overall response rate. NGS of the 16 tumor specimens demonstrated that the most common co-occurring copy number alteration was CCNE1 amplification, which was present in 40% of HER2+ tumors. The relationship between CCNE1 amplification and lack of response to HER2-targeted therapy trended toward statistical significance (66.7% of non-responders versus 22.2% of responders harbored CCNE1 amplification; P = 0.08). Patients with high level ERBB2 amplification by NGS were more likely to respond to therapy, compared with patients with low level ERBB2 amplification (P = 0.02). Analysis of cfDNA showed that detectable ERBB2 copy number amplification in plasma was predictive to the response (100%, response rate) and changes in plasma-detected genomic alterations were associated with lapatinib sensitivity and/or resistance. The follow-up cfDNA genomics at disease progression demonstrated that there are emergences of other genomic aberrations such as MYC, EGFR, FGFR2 and MET amplifications. Conclusions: The present study showed that HER2+ GC patients respond differently according to concomitant genomic aberrations beyond ERBB2, high ERBB2 amplification by NGS or cfDNA can be a positive predictor for patient selection, and tumor genomic alterations change significantly during targeted agent therapy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCell-Free SystemErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLapatinibMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinib

Identifiers

PMID29409051
PMCPMC5913644
OpenAlexW2792099291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.