Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29408906›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Efficacy and safety of Modified Tongxie Yaofang in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome management: A meta-analysis of randomized, positive medicine-controlled trials.

Yun-Kai Dai, Dan-Yan Li, Yun-Zhan Zhang, Meng-Xin Huang, Yi-le Zhou, Jin-Tong Ye, Qi Wang, Ling Hu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Second Asian Consensus on Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yun-Kai DaiInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dan-Yan LiInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yun-Zhan ZhangInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Meng-Xin HuangInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yi-le ZhouInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jin-Tong YeInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qi WangInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ling HuInstitute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-8050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Modified Tongxie Yaofang (M-TXYF) for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).

methodElectronic databases including PubMed, Springer Link, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM), Wanfang, and Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP) were conducted from their inception through May 11, 2017 without language restrictions. Primary and secondary outcomes were estimated by 95% confidence intervals (CI). RevMan 5.3 and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool were analyzed for this meta-analysis.

resultsTwenty-three literatures with a total of 1972 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The overall risk of bias evaluation was low. The pooled odds ratio showed that M-TXYF was significantly superior to routine pharmacotherapies (RP) in clinical therapeutic efficacy (OR 4.04, 95% CI 3.09, 5.27, P < 0.00001, therapeutic gain = 17.6%, number needed to treat (NNT) = 5.7). Moreover, compared with RP, M-TXYF showed that it can significantly reduce the scores of abdominal pain (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.27; 95% CI -1.99, -0.56; P = 0.0005), abdominal distention (SMD -0.37; 95% CI -0.73, -0.01; P = 0.09), diarrhea (SMD -1.10; 95% CI -1.95, -0.25; P = 0.01), and frequency of defecation (SMD -1.42; 95% CI -2.19, -0.65; P = 0.0003). The differences of the adverse events between experiment and control groups had no statistical significance.

conclusionThis meta-analysis indicated that M-TXYF could be a promising Chinese herbal formula in treating IBS-D. However, considering the lack of higher quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), highly believable evidences should be required.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicDiarrheaDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeDrugs, Chinese Herbaltongxie-yaofang

Identifiers

PMID29408906
PMCPMC5800650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.