ArticlePloS one2018
Sequence-based multiscale modeling for high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial and Sequential Topological Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of IgG1 Fc Domains.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Hodge theory-based biomolecular data analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- BHi-Cect: a top-down algorithm for identifying the multi-scale hierarchical structure of chromosomes.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce sequence-based multiscale modeling for biomolecular data analysis. We employ spectral clustering method in our modeling and reveal the difference between sequence-based global scale clustering and local scale clustering. Essentially, two types of distances, i.e., Euclidean (or spatial) distance and genomic (or sequential) distance, can be used in data clustering. Clusters from sequence-based global scale models optimize spatial distances, meaning spatially adjacent loci are more likely to be assigned into the same cluster. Sequence-based local scale models, on the other hand, result in clusters that optimize genomic distances. That is to say, in these models, sequentially adjoining loci tend to be cluster together. We propose two sequence-based multiscale models (SeqMMs) for the study of chromosome hierarchical structures, including genomic compartments and topological associated domains (TADs). We find that genomic compartments are determined only by global scale information in the Hi-C data. The removal of all the local interactions within a band region as large as 10 Mb in genomic distance has almost no significant influence on the final compartment results. Further, in TAD analysis, we find that when the sequential scale is small, a tiny variation of diagonal band region in a contact map will result in a great change in the predicted TAD boundaries. When the scale value is larger than a threshold value, the TAD boundaries become very consistent. This threshold value is highly related to TAD sizes. By the comparison of our results with those previously obtained using a spectral clustering model, we find that our method is more robust and reliable. Finally, we demonstrate that almost all TAD boundaries from both clustering methods are local minimum of a TAD summation function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.