Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29408590›Full record

ArticleAppetite2018

Brain response to food cues varying in portion size is associated with individual differences in the portion size effect in children.

Kathleen L Keller, Laural K English, S Nicole Fearnbach, Marlou Lasschuijt, Kaitlin Anderson, Maria Bermudez, Jennifer O Fisher, Barbara J Rolls, Stephen J Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathleen L KellerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: klk37@psu.edu.
Laural K EnglishDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
S Nicole FearnbachBrain and Metabolism Imaging in Chronic Disease, Louisiana State University Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Marlou LasschuijtDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Kaitlin AndersonDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Maria BermudezDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Jennifer O FisherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Barbara J RollsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Stephen J WilsonDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Training in Obesity ResearchT32DK064584 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI CORBY K MARTIN, Christopher D Morrison · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK064584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large portions promote intake of energy dense foods (i.e., the portion size effect--PSE), but the neurobiological drivers of this effect are not known. We tested the association between blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) brain response to food images varied by portion size (PS) and energy density (ED) and children's intake at test-meals of high- and low-ED foods served at varying portions. Children (N = 47; age 7-10 years) participated in a within-subjects, crossover study consisting of 4 meals of increasing PS of high- and low-ED foods and 1 fMRI to evaluate food images at 2 levels of PS (Large, Small) and 2 levels of ED (High, Low). Contrast values between PS conditions (e.g., Large PS - Small PS) were calculated from BOLD signal in brain regions implicated in cognitive control and reward and input as covariates in mixed models to determine if they moderated the PSE curve. Results showed a significant effect of PS on intake. Responses to Large relative to Small PS in brain regions implicated in salience (e.g., ventromedial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex) were positively associated with the linear slope (i.e., increase in intake from baseline) of the PSE curve, but negatively associated with the quadratic coefficient for the total meal. Responses to Large PS High ED relative to Small PS High ED cues in regions associated with cognitive control (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) were negatively associated with the linear slope of the PSE curve for high-ED foods. Brain responses to PS cues were associated with individual differences in children's susceptibility to overeating from large portions. Responses in food salience regions positively associated with PSE susceptibility while activation in control regions negatively associated with PSE susceptibility.

Indexed as

IndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainChildCross-Over StudiesCuesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMealsPhotic StimulationPortion SizeBrainEating behaviorfMRIPediatricsPortion size

Identifiers

PMID29408590
PMCPMC5878726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.