ArticleAppetite2018
Brain response to food cues varying in portion size is associated with individual differences in the portion size effect in children.
Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social Media and Children's and Adolescents' Diets: A Systematic Review of the Underlying Social and Physiological Mechanisms.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Pooled it
- Children's Portion Selection Is Predicted by Food Liking and Is Related to Intake in Response to Increased Portions.The Journal of nutrition · 2022Trial
- Portion size can be used strategically to increase intake of vegetables and fruits in young children over multiple days: a cluster-randomized crossover trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Trial
- Portion size has sustained effects over 5 days in preschool children: a randomized trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Trial
- PACE: a Novel Eating Behavior Phenotype to Assess Risk for Obesity in Middle Childhood.The Journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Does 'portion size' matter? Brain responses to food and non-food cues presented in varying amounts.Appetite · 2024Article
- The Cerebellar Response to Visual Portion Size Cues Is Associated with the Portion Size Effect in Children.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Children with lower ratings of executive functions have a greater response to the portion size effect.Appetite · 2023Article
- Influence of exclusive breastfeeding on hippocampal structure, satiety responsiveness, and weight status.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Article
- Olfactory and Gustatory Supra-Threshold Sensitivities Are Linked toFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The role of reinforcement learning and value-based decision-making frameworks in understanding food choice and eating behaviors.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Decision-Making Processes Related to Perseveration Are Indirectly Associated With Weight Status in Children Through Laboratory-Assessed Energy Intake.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Review
- Food commercials do not affect energy intake in a laboratory meal but do alter brain responses to visual food cues in children.Appetite · 2019Article
- Is brain response to food rewards related to overeating? A test of the reward surfeit model of overeating in children.Appetite · 2018Article
- Identifying behavioral phenotypes for childhood obesity.Appetite · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large portions promote intake of energy dense foods (i.e., the portion size effect--PSE), but the neurobiological drivers of this effect are not known. We tested the association between blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) brain response to food images varied by portion size (PS) and energy density (ED) and children's intake at test-meals of high- and low-ED foods served at varying portions. Children (N = 47; age 7-10 years) participated in a within-subjects, crossover study consisting of 4 meals of increasing PS of high- and low-ED foods and 1 fMRI to evaluate food images at 2 levels of PS (Large, Small) and 2 levels of ED (High, Low). Contrast values between PS conditions (e.g., Large PS - Small PS) were calculated from BOLD signal in brain regions implicated in cognitive control and reward and input as covariates in mixed models to determine if they moderated the PSE curve. Results showed a significant effect of PS on intake. Responses to Large relative to Small PS in brain regions implicated in salience (e.g., ventromedial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex) were positively associated with the linear slope (i.e., increase in intake from baseline) of the PSE curve, but negatively associated with the quadratic coefficient for the total meal. Responses to Large PS High ED relative to Small PS High ED cues in regions associated with cognitive control (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) were negatively associated with the linear slope of the PSE curve for high-ED foods. Brain responses to PS cues were associated with individual differences in children's susceptibility to overeating from large portions. Responses in food salience regions positively associated with PSE susceptibility while activation in control regions negatively associated with PSE susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.