Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29408312›Full record

SynthesisNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2018

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature characterizing auditory mismatch negativity in individuals with autism.

Sophie Schwartz, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Helen Tager-Flusberg

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Auditory Sensitivity in Autism: A Systematic Review of Mismatch Negativity and Mismatch Field Responses.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mismatch Negativity in Autism: Insights Into Predictive Mechanisms.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Reliability of mismatch negativity event-related potentials in a multisite, traveling subjects study.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie SchwartzGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: sopheschwartz@gmail.com.
Barbara Shinn-CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Helen Tager-FlusbergDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Boston University · US

Funding

Testing the efficacy of a novel intervention for minimally verbal children with P50DC013027 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI JOSEPH, ROBERT M · 2012 to 2016
$9.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC013027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of past studies have used mismatch negativity (MMN) to identify auditory processing deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Our meta-analysis compared MMN responses for individuals with ASD and typically developing controls (TD). We analyzed 67 experiments across 22 publications that employed passive, auditory-based MMN paradigms with ASD and TD participants. Most studies lacked design characteristics that would lead to an accurate description of the MMN. Variability between experiments measuring MMN amplitude was smaller when limited to studies that counterbalanced stimuli. Reduced MMN amplitude was found among young children with ASD compared to controls and in experiments that used nonspeech sounds. Still, few studies included adolescents or those with below-average verbal IQ. Most studies suffered from small sample sizes, and aggregating these data did not reveal significant group differences. This analysis points to a need for research focused specifically on understudied ASD samples using carefully designed MMN experiments. Study of individual differences in MMN may provide further insights into distinct subgroups within the heterogeneous ASD population.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, AuditoryAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionAutism Spectrum DisorderElectroencephalographyHumansAuditory processingAutismEvent-related potentialMeta-analysisMismatch fieldMismatch negativityMMFMMNOddballSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29408312
PMCPMC5845770
OpenAlexW2790775071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.