Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29407688›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2018

In pursuit of a self-sustaining college alcohol intervention: Deploying gamified PNF in the real world.

Andrew M Earle, Joseph W LaBrie, Sarah C Boyle, Daniel Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Digital interventions for substance use disorders in young people: rapid review.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew M EarleLoyola Marymount University, United States.
Joseph W LaBrieLoyola Marymount University, United States. Electronic address: jlabrie@lmu.edu.
Sarah C BoyleLoyola Marymount University, United States.
Daniel SmithLoyola Marymount University, United States.

Funding

Alcohol and Bone Health: Skeletal Effects of Heavy Episodic Drinking in CollegeSignificanceR21AA022942 · NIAAA · LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY · PI ALMSTEDT, HAWLEY CHASE, LABRIE, JOSEPH W. · 2015 to 2016
$362k
The Role of Social Media in the Alcohol-Risk Trajectories of First-Year StudentsR21AA024853 · NIAAA · LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY · PI LABRIE, JOSEPH W. · 2017 to 2018
$362k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA022942NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA024853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our recent work (Boyle, Earle, LaBrie, & Smith, 2017) showed that the efficacy of personalized normative feedback-based (PNF) college alcohol interventions can be improved through the addition of gamified elements including points, chance, competition, and personal avatars. However, participants in that study were compensated with subject pool credit. In the current study, we piloted an upgraded, smartphone-based version of the game, which was designed to be truly self-sustaining (i.e., engaging enough that students play voluntarily without the presence of external motivators). First-year students were invited to play the game weekly for six rounds, with participants submitting and voting on their own questions each week and receiving a novel type of feedback in addition to standard descriptive PNF: opposite peers' judgments of participants' self-reported drinking behavior, or reflective norms. With no play-based incentives, 222 first-year college students voluntarily played the game, CampusGANDR. ANCOVA models revealed that, relative to participants randomized to receive feedback on control topics during the three intervention rounds, those who received both descriptive and reflective feedback on peer alcohol use had significantly reduced normative perceptions and reduced alcohol use two months post intervention. This was especially true among heavy drinkers. The results suggest that our gamified "GANDR" approach shows promise as a self-sustaining intervention and, further, that high-risk drinkers may benefit disproportionately from this methodology. Thus, self-sustaining interventions represent an encouraging avenue for future research and development and may hold the potential to impact risky college drinking on a large scale.

Indexed as

Alcohol Drinking in CollegeFeedback, PsychologicalSmartphoneSocial NormsVideo GamesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsMotivationPeer GroupStudentsUniversitiesAlcohol useCollege studentsGamificationNormative feedbackSelf-sustaining interventionSocial norms

Identifiers

PMID29407688
PMCPMC5857236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.