Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29407626›Full record

SynthesisThrombosis research2018

Laboratory biomarkers for venous thromboembolism risk in patients with hematologic malignancies: A review.

B T Samuelson Bannow, B A Konkle

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Thrombosis research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk Assessment for Venous Thrombosis in Lymphoma and Emerging Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. P- and E- selectin in venous thrombosis and non-venous pathologies.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dimethyl 2,2'-[2,2'-(ethane-1,1-diyl)bis(1International journal of nanomedicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B T Samuelson BannowDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: bts99@uw.edu.
B A KonkleDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Bloodworks Northwest, 921 Terry Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN HEMATOLOGYT32HL007093 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Janis L Abkowitz · 1985 to 2026
$13.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with hematologic malignancies, few tools exist to assist providers in identifying those patients at highest risk for this potentially fatal complication. Laboratory biomarkers, such as d-dimer, have demonstrated utility in some clinical settings to distinguish patients at increased risk. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature utilizing search terms including "biomarker", "venous thromboembolism", "hematologic malignancy", "lymphoma", "myeloma" and "leukemia" in the Medline database. A total of 25 studies investigating laboratory biomarkers of increased thrombotic risk in the setting of hematologic malignancy were identified and included in this review. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe most studied biomarkers, d-dimer and fibrinogen, demonstrated some degree of efficacy in identifying high-risk patients at levels >4.0 mg/L or <1.0 g/L respectively. Additional markers which demonstrated promise included thrombin generation, mean platelet volume, soluble VEGF, soluble P-selectin and extracellular vesicles. Other biomarkers reviewed, which did not consistently demonstrate significant associations with VTE included prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, factor VIII, protein C, protein S, von Willebrand antigen and activity, antithrombin, thrombin antithrombin complex, antiphospholopid antibody, plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and several variants associated with known hypercoagulable states (factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene variant, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase variant). Data to support any of the biomarkers discussed here in routine clinical decision-making are currently lacking, but additional investigation in clinical studies, ideally in combination with clinical factors known to be associated with increased thrombotic risk, is warranted.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleRisk FactorsVenous ThromboembolismBiomarkersBiomarkerD-dimerFibrinogenHematologic malignancyHematologic neoplasmVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID29407626
PMCPMC5879008
OpenAlexW2791884394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.