SynthesisThrombosis research2018
Laboratory biomarkers for venous thromboembolism risk in patients with hematologic malignancies: A review.
Synthesis in Thrombosis research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Assessment for Venous Thrombosis in Lymphoma and Emerging Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Venous thromboembolism risk in newly diagnosed lymphoma patients: a real-world prospective observational study from Vietnam National Cancer Hospital.BMC cancer · 2025Observational
- Time series differences in coagulopathy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 and bacterial pneumonia patients: a nationwide observational study in Japan.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
- High preoperative D-dimer increases the risk of venous thromboembolism after gynecological tumor surgeries: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the incidence, predictors, risk assessment scores and outcomes of thromboembolism in a cohort of Egyptian NHL patients - Real World Experience.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Practical management of disease-related manifestations and drug toxicities in patients with multiple myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- A phenome-wide approach to identify causal risk factors for deep vein thrombosis.BMC medical genomics · 2023Article
- Article
- Vascular endothelial growth factor and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a genetic correlation and two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Thrombosis journal · 2022Article
- P- and E- selectin in venous thrombosis and non-venous pathologies.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Review
- ADAMTS13, VWF, and Endotoxin Are Interrelated and Associated with the Severity of Liver Cirrhosis via Hypercoagulability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Association between ADAMTS13 activity-VWF antigen imbalance and the therapeutic effect of HAIC in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Hematological Phenotype of COVID-19-Induced Coagulopathy: Far from Typical Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Dimethyl 2,2'-[2,2'-(ethane-1,1-diyl)bis(1International journal of nanomedicine · 2018Article
- Proteomic Identification of Plasma Biomarkers in Children and Adolescents with Recurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with hematologic malignancies, few tools exist to assist providers in identifying those patients at highest risk for this potentially fatal complication. Laboratory biomarkers, such as d-dimer, have demonstrated utility in some clinical settings to distinguish patients at increased risk. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature utilizing search terms including "biomarker", "venous thromboembolism", "hematologic malignancy", "lymphoma", "myeloma" and "leukemia" in the Medline database. A total of 25 studies investigating laboratory biomarkers of increased thrombotic risk in the setting of hematologic malignancy were identified and included in this review. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThe most studied biomarkers, d-dimer and fibrinogen, demonstrated some degree of efficacy in identifying high-risk patients at levels >4.0 mg/L or <1.0 g/L respectively. Additional markers which demonstrated promise included thrombin generation, mean platelet volume, soluble VEGF, soluble P-selectin and extracellular vesicles. Other biomarkers reviewed, which did not consistently demonstrate significant associations with VTE included prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, factor VIII, protein C, protein S, von Willebrand antigen and activity, antithrombin, thrombin antithrombin complex, antiphospholopid antibody, plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and several variants associated with known hypercoagulable states (factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene variant, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase variant). Data to support any of the biomarkers discussed here in routine clinical decision-making are currently lacking, but additional investigation in clinical studies, ideally in combination with clinical factors known to be associated with increased thrombotic risk, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.