Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29407530›Full record

ArticleBrain research2018

From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming.

Gabriela Meade, Jonathan Grainger, Katherine J Midgley, Karen Emmorey, Phillip J Holcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phonological precision for word recognition in skilled readers.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriela MeadeJoint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University & University of California, San Diego, United States. Electronic address: meade.gabriela@gmail.com.
Jonathan GraingerLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS & Aix-Marseille University, France.
Katherine J MidgleyDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, United States.
Karen EmmoreySchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, United States.
Phillip J HolcombDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, United States.

Funding

The Neuro-cognition of Word ComprehensionR37HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
The cognitive neuroscience of word comprehensionR01HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 1995 to 2010
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD025889NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD025889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactive-activation models posit that visual word recognition involves co-activation of orthographic neighbors (e.g., note, node) and competition among them via lateral inhibitory connections. Behavioral evidence of this lexical competition comes from masked priming paradigms, in which target words elicit slower responses when preceded by a neighbor (e.g., note-NODE) than when preceded by an unrelated word (e.g., kiss-NODE). In the present study, we used ERPs to investigate how masked high frequency word primes influence processing of low frequency word and pseudoword targets. Word targets preceded by a neighbor prime elicited larger negativities within the N400 window than those preceded by an unrelated prime across bilateral anterior sites, which we call a reversed N400 priming effect. Consistent with the behavioral literature, the size of the reversed N400 priming effect was larger for targets from high-density orthographic neighborhoods and for participants who scored higher on a behavioral measure of spelling recognition. Indeed, the opposite effect (i.e., smaller negativities within the N400 window for word targets preceded by a neighbor) was observed for words from low-density orthographic neighborhoods and for less-skilled spellers. Traditional priming was also observed within the N250 window for word targets and within both the N250 or N400 windows for pseudoword targets. The specificity of the reversed N400 priming effect to situations in which both words have precise lexical representations suggests that it, like the behavioral interference effect, indexes lexical competition during visual word recognition.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansLanguageMalePattern Recognition, VisualPerceptual MaskingReaction TimeReadingVisual PerceptionYoung AdultInteractive-activation modelsLexical competitionMasked primingN400Orthographic neighbors

Identifiers

PMID29407530
PMCPMC5840043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.