ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2018
Stroke Prevention for High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Setting: The Emergency Physician Perspective.
Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency Department capacity to initiate thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation and thrombotic risk after discharge: URGFAICS cohort analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Oral anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation in the ED: RE-LY AF registry analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Practice Gap in Atrial Fibrillation Oral Anticoagulation Prescribing at Emergency Department Home Discharge.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Prescribing of oral anticoagulants in the emergency department and subsequent long-term use by older adults with atrial fibrillation.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Stroke Prophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation? To Prescribe or Not to Prescribe-A Qualitative Study on the Decisionmaking Process of Emergency Department Providers.Annals of emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Stroke Prophylaxis After a New Emergency Department Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018Article
- Stroke Prevention for High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Setting: Differences Between Canada and the United States.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is a frequent reason for presentation to an emergency department (ED), and the number of these visits are increasing. This creates an opportunity to improve the suboptimal rate of oral anticoagulation (OAC) use in patients with atrial fibrillation who are at high risk of stroke. However, there are very few data on whether OAC initiation in the ED, compared with referral to the longitudinal health care provider to initiate it, results in better long-term use. Moreover, for ethical and medicolegal reasons, physicians who initiate a chronic medication are obliged to reassess the patient at a later date, to check for medication side effects and the need for dose adjustment. More research is needed to determine whether OAC should be prescribed in the ED, by a physician who will never see the patient again. Patients who are cardioverted in the ED might be an exception, secondary to the increased risk of stroke after cardioversion. If ED OAC prescribing is associated with better outcomes, these results must be placed into context with the care and outcomes of the other patients in the ED. If there is a net benefit, the findings should be disseminated to practicing emergency physicians, preferably via emergency physician opinion leaders. An implementation science-based approach, which addresses the barriers to ED OAC prescribing (eg, the competing demands of running an ED and lack of guaranteed follow-up care after discharge from an ED), should be used to support prescribing of OAC in the ED. Potential solutions are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29407006What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.