Observational studyCritical care medicine2018
Reporting of Sepsis Cases for Performance Measurement Versus for Reimbursement in New York State.
Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Implementation Gap in Early Septic Shock Resuscitation: A Three-Barrier Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimization of Preclinical Rodent Research Models of Human Shock: Part One Intra-Abdominal Sepsis.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Review
- NEWS, SIRS and qSOFA criteria for predicting sepsis and sepsis with high risk of death in emergency room: A comparison study and improved predictive models based on local data from CETAT and MIMIC-IV databases.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Observational
- Disparities in Palliative Care Among Critically Ill Patients With and Without COVID-19 at the End of Life: A Population-Based Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2023Article
- The prognostic impact of rheumatoid arthritis in sepsis: a population-based analysis.Acute and critical care · 2022Article
- Association of multiple sclerosis with mortality in sepsis: a population-level analysis.Journal of intensive care · 2022Article
- Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2021Observational
- Temporal Trends and Hospital Variation in Time-to-Antibiotics Among Veterans Hospitalized With Sepsis.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2021Review
- Article
- LncRNA H19 Inhibits the Progression of Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Injury via Regulation of the miR-93-5p/SORBS2 Axis.Inflammation · 2021Article
- Economic Analysis of Mandated Protocolized Sepsis Care in New York Hospitals.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data.BMJ quality & safety · 2020Observational
- New Medical Device Acquisition During Pediatric Severe Sepsis Hospitalizations.Critical care medicine · 2020Observational
- Epidemiology and outcomes of sepsis among hospitalizations with systemic lupus erythematosus admitted to the ICU: a population-based cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2020Article
- Patient Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of a Sepsis Care Quality Improvement Program in a Health System.Critical care medicine · 2019Observational
- Article
- Veterans Affairs patient database (VAPD 2014-2017): building nationwide granular data for clinical discovery.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Using objective clinical data to track progress on preventing and treating sepsis: CDC's new 'Adult Sepsis Event' surveillance strategy.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Review
- Mortality Measures to Profile Hospital Performance for Patients With Septic Shock.Critical care medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesUnder "Rory's Regulations," New York State Article 28 acute care hospitals were mandated to implement sepsis protocols and report patient-level data. This study sought to determine how well cases reported under state mandate align with discharge records in a statewide administrative database.
designObservational cohort study.
settingFirst 27 months of mandated sepsis reporting (April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016). PATIENTS: Hospitalizations with sepsis at New York State Article 28 acute care hospitals.
interventionSepsis regulations with mandated reporting. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe compared cases reported to the New York State Department of Health Sepsis Clinical Database with discharge records in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. We classified discharges as 1) "coded sepsis discharges"-a diagnosis code for severe sepsis or septic shock and 2) "possible sepsis discharges," using Dombrovskiy and Angus criteria. Of 111,816 sepsis cases reported to the New York State Department of Health Sepsis Clinical Database, 105,722 (94.5%) were matched to discharge records in Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. The percentage of coded sepsis discharges reported increased from 67.5% in the first quarter to 81.3% in the final quarter of the study period (mean, 77.7%). Accounting for unmatched cases, as many as 82.7% of coded sepsis discharges were potentially reported, whereas at least 17.3% were unreported. Compared with unreported discharges, reported discharges had higher rates of acute organ dysfunction (e.g., cardiovascular dysfunction 63.0% vs 51.8%; p < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (30.2% vs 26.1%; p < 0.001). Hospital characteristics (e.g., number of beds, teaching status, volume of sepsis cases) were similar between hospitals with a higher versus lower percent of discharges reported, p values greater than 0.05 for all. Hospitals' percent of discharges reported was not correlated with risk-adjusted mortality of their submitted cases (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.11; p = 0.17).
conclusionsApproximately four of five discharges with a diagnosis code of severe sepsis or septic shock in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data were reported in the New York State Department of Health Sepsis Clinical Database. Incomplete reporting appears to be driven more by underrecognition than attempts to game the system, with minimal bias to risk-adjusted hospital performance measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.