ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2018
Prostate cancer patients' experience and preferences for acquiring information early in their care.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of patient information format on the experience of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Enhancing care: evaluating the impact of True North Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eTraining for healthcare providers working with prostate cancer patients and partners.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Time pressure predicts decisional regret in men with localized prostate cancer: data from a longitudinal multicenter study.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Needs, Preferences, and Values during Different Treatment Decisions of Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Health-Related Internet Use Among Men With Prostate Cancer in Canada: Cancer Registry Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- [Internet use after prostate cancer : Search for information and trust in disease-related information in long-term survivors].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Article
- Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- Making their decisions for prostate cancer treatment: Patients' experiences and preferences related to process.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProstate cancer patients' information needs are well-described, but little is known about their preferred sources and media for obtaining information. We sought to determine prostate cancer patients' experiences and preferences for acquiring information after diagnosis, a time of high information need.
methodsPopulation surveys were conducted in four Canadian provinces in 2014-2015. Each provincial cancer registry surveyed a random sample of prostate cancer patients diagnosed in late 2012.
resultsA total of 1366 patients responded across provinces. Respondents most frequently tried to obtain information from their urologist; 86% found that easy and 9% found it difficult. Seventy-nine percent of respondents who saw only a urologist felt well-informed compared to 86% of those who saw both a urologist and a radiation oncologist. Eighty-five percent of respondents wanted printed information; 68% wanted it electronically. Respondents' most frequent barriers to obtaining information from physicians were: not actually having enough time (31%), worrying about having enough time (23%), and worrying about asking too many questions (18%). Their most frequent barriers related to internet/printed information, respectively, were uncertainty about quality (63%/49%) and unclear if personally applicable (56%/49%). Recommended facilitators were having a navigator (85%), providing printed information (85%), and someone to answer questions: in person (90%), by phone (66%), or via email (58%).
conclusionsProstate cancer patients want urologists to provide them with information and are more likely to report being informed if they see both a urologist and a radiation oncologist. Optimal information provision requires that it be provided both on the internet and in print.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.