ArticleVirulence2018
Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours?
Article in Virulence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial enzyme-responsive hydrogels for triggered delivery of antibiotics to infected wounds.Science advances · 2026Article
- Nanowire-Mediated Eradication of Polymicrobial Biofilms.ACS omega · 2026Article
- The wound microbiota: microbial mechanisms of impaired wound healing and infection.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Human-Derived collagen hydrogel as an antibiotic vehicle for topical treatment of bacterial biofilms.PloS one · 2024Article
- Predicting the re-distribution of antibiotic molecules caused by inter-species interactions in microbial communities.ISME communications · 2022Article
- Clinical Features and Outcomes of Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due to Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides in Polymicrobial Biofilm-Associated Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the number of examples that correlate interspecies interactions in polymicrobial infections with variations in pathogenicity and antibiotic susceptibility of individual organisms, antibiotic therapies are selected to target the most relevant pathogen, with no consideration of the consequences that the presence of other bacterial species may have in the pathogenicity and response to antimicrobial agents. In this issue of Virulence, Garcia-Perez et al. [ 10 ] applied replica plating of used wound dressings to assess the topography of distinct S. aureus types in chronic wounds of patients with the genetic blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa, which is characterized by the development of chronic wounds upon simple mechanical trauma. This approach led to the identification of two strains of S. aureus coexisting with Bacillus thuringiensis and Klebsiella oxytoca. S. aureus is highly prevalent in chronic wound infections, whereas B. thuringiensis and K. oxytoca are regarded as opportunistic pathogens. These bacterial species did not inhibit each other's growth under laboratory conditions, suggesting that they do not compete through the production of inhibitory compounds. Using a top-down proteomic approach to explore the inherent relationships between these co-existing bacteria, the exoproteomes of the staphylococcal isolates in monoculture and co-culture with B. thuringiensis or K. oxytoca were characterized by Mass Spectrometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.