Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29405770›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2018

Liquid biopsy and its role in an advanced clinical trial for lung cancer.

Donald J Johann, Mathew Steliga, Ik J Shin, Donghoon Yoon, Konstantinos Arnaoutakis, Laura Hutchins, Meeiyueh Liu, Jason Liem, Karl Walker, Andy Pereira and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Current and Future Development in Lung Cancer Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Liquid Biopsy: A Family of Possible Diagnostic Tools.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Emerging Role of Exosomes in Cancer Chemoresistance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Genetic Markers in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Donald J Johann1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Mathew Steliga2 Surgery, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Ik J Shin1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Donghoon Yoon1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Konstantinos Arnaoutakis1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Laura Hutchins1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-0802
Meeiyueh Liu1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Jason Liem1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Karl Walker3 Computer Science, 164349 University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff , Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA.
Andy Pereira4 Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Mary Yang5 Bioinformatics, 14658 University of Arkansas at Little Rock , Little Rock, AR 72204, USA.
Susanne K Jeffus1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Erich Peterson1 Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, 12215 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Joshua Xu6 Bioinformatics, 4136 National Center for Toxicological Research , US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72709, USA.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
Developing integrative approaches for identifying disease-causing genes and dysfunctional networksR15GM114739 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK · PI YANG, MARY · 2015 to 2015
$374k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM114739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy methodologies, for the purpose of plasma genotyping of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of solid tumors, are a new class of novel molecular assays. Such assays are rapidly entering the clinical sphere of research-based monitoring in translational oncology, especially for thoracic malignancies. Potential applications for these blood-based cfDNA assays include: (i) initial diagnosis, (ii) response to therapy and follow-up, (iii) tumor evolution, and (iv) minimal residual disease evaluation. Precision medicine will benefit from cutting-edge molecular diagnostics, especially regarding treatment decisions in the adjuvant setting, where avoiding over-treatment and unnecessary toxicity are paramount. The use of innovative genetic analysis techniques on individual patient tumor samples is being pursued in several advanced clinical trials. Rather than using a categorical treatment plan, the next critical step of therapeutic decision making is providing the "right" cancer therapy for an individual patient, including correct dose and timeframe based on the molecular analysis of the tumor in question. Per the 21st Century Cures Act, innovative clinical trials are integral for biomarker and drug development. This will include advanced clinical trials utilizing: (i) innovative assays, (ii) molecular profiling with cutting-edge bioinformatics, and (iii) clinically relevant animal or tissue models. In this paper, a mini-review addresses state-of-the-art liquid biopsy approaches. Additionally, an on-going advanced clinical trial for lung cancer with novelty through synergizing liquid biopsies, co-clinical trials, and advanced bioinformatics is also presented. Impact statement Liquid biopsy technology is providing a new source for cancer biomarkers, and adds new dimensions in advanced clinical trials. Utilizing a non-invasive routine blood draw, the liquid biopsy provides abilities to address perplexing issues of tumor tissue heterogeneity by identifying mutations in both primary and metastatic lesions. Regarding the assessment of response to cancer therapy, the liquid biopsy is not ready to replace medical imaging, but adds critical new information; for instance, through a temporal assessment of quantitative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay results, and importantly, the ability to monitor for signs of resistance, via emerging clones. Adjuvant therapy may soon be considered based on a quantitative cfDNA assay. As sensitivity and specificity of the technology continue to progress, cancer screening and prevention will improve and save countless lives by finding the cancer early, so that a routine surgery may be all that is required for a definitive cure.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsClinical Decision-MakingDNA, NeoplasmGenotypeHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm, ResidualPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, NeoplasmBioinformaticsbiomarkerscancergenomicsliquid biopsyprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID29405770
PMCPMC5813874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.