Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29405340›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.

Chenyang Shen, Bin Li, Liyuan Chen, Ming Yang, Yifei Lou, Xun Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dental management in head and neck cancers: from intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons to proton therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenyang ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75287, USA.
Bin LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75287, USA.
Liyuan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75287, USA.
Ming YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75287, USA.
Yifei LouDepartment of Mathematical Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, 75080, USA.
Xun JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75287, USA.

Funding

National Particle Therapy Research Center (NPTRC)P20CA183639 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2015 to 2016
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA183639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate calculation of proton stopping power ratio (SPR) relative to water is crucial to proton therapy treatment planning, since SPR affects prediction of beam range. Current standard practice derives SPR using a single CT scan. Recent studies showed that dual-energy CT (DECT) offers advantages to accurately determine SPR. One method to further improve accuracy is to incorporate prior knowledge on human tissue composition through a dictionary approach. In addition, it is also suggested that using CT images with multiple (more than two) energy channels, i.e., multi-energy CT (MECT), can further improve accuracy. In this paper, we proposed a sparse dictionary-based method to convert CT numbers of DECT or MECT to elemental composition (EC) and relative electron density (rED) for SPR computation.

methodA dictionary was constructed to include materials generated based on human tissues of known compositions. For a voxel with CT numbers of different energy channels, its EC and rED are determined subject to a constraint that the resulting EC is a linear non-negative combination of only a few tissues in the dictionary. We formulated this as a non-convex optimization problem. A novel algorithm was designed to solve the problem. The proposed method has a unified structure to handle both DECT and MECT with different number of channels. We tested our method in both simulation and experimental studies.

resultsAverage errors of SPR in experimental studies were 0.70% in DECT, 0.53% in MECT with three energy channels, and 0.45% in MECT with four channels. We also studied the impact of parameter values and established appropriate parameter values for our method.

conclusionThe proposed method can accurately calculate SPR using DECT and MECT. The results suggest that using more energy channels may improve the SPR estimation accuracy.

Indexed as

ProtonsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalibrationModels, TheoreticalProtonsdictionarydual- and multi-energy CTelemental decompositionproton therapysparsitystopping power ratio

Identifiers

PMID29405340
PMCPMC5904041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.