ArticleMedical physics2018
Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.
Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing material composition determination in dual-energy computed tomography: a comparative study of a linear model and a fully connected neural network.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Spectral CT image reconstruction using a constrained optimization approach-An algorithm for AAPM 2022 spectral CT grand challenge and beyond.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Dental management in head and neck cancers: from intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons to proton therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Review
- Simultaneous Image Reconstruction and Element Decomposition for Iodine Contrast Agent Visualization in Multienergy Element-Resolved Cone Beam CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Improving dose calculation accuracy in preclinical radiation experiments using multi-energy element resolved cone-beam CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- NRG Oncology Survey of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Use in US Proton Therapy Centers.International journal of particle therapy · 2021Article
- DECT-MULTRA: Dual-Energy CT Image Decomposition With Learned Mixed Material Models and Efficient Clustering.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Model-based material decomposition with a penalized nonlinear least-squares CT reconstruction algorithm.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.Medical physics · 2018Article
- Multienergy element-resolved cone beam CT (MEER-CBCT) realized on a conventional CBCT platform.Medical physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate calculation of proton stopping power ratio (SPR) relative to water is crucial to proton therapy treatment planning, since SPR affects prediction of beam range. Current standard practice derives SPR using a single CT scan. Recent studies showed that dual-energy CT (DECT) offers advantages to accurately determine SPR. One method to further improve accuracy is to incorporate prior knowledge on human tissue composition through a dictionary approach. In addition, it is also suggested that using CT images with multiple (more than two) energy channels, i.e., multi-energy CT (MECT), can further improve accuracy. In this paper, we proposed a sparse dictionary-based method to convert CT numbers of DECT or MECT to elemental composition (EC) and relative electron density (rED) for SPR computation.
methodA dictionary was constructed to include materials generated based on human tissues of known compositions. For a voxel with CT numbers of different energy channels, its EC and rED are determined subject to a constraint that the resulting EC is a linear non-negative combination of only a few tissues in the dictionary. We formulated this as a non-convex optimization problem. A novel algorithm was designed to solve the problem. The proposed method has a unified structure to handle both DECT and MECT with different number of channels. We tested our method in both simulation and experimental studies.
resultsAverage errors of SPR in experimental studies were 0.70% in DECT, 0.53% in MECT with three energy channels, and 0.45% in MECT with four channels. We also studied the impact of parameter values and established appropriate parameter values for our method.
conclusionThe proposed method can accurately calculate SPR using DECT and MECT. The results suggest that using more energy channels may improve the SPR estimation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.