Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29405291›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical investigation2018

Upregulated N-cadherin expression is associated with poor prognosis in epithelial-derived solid tumours: A meta-analysis.

Yong Luo, Ting Yu, Qiongwen Zhang, Qingyu Fu, Yuzhu Hu, Mengmeng Xiang, Haoning Peng, Tianying Zheng, Li Lu, Huashan Shi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Knockout ofCancer genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  3. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Acute Leukemias.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong LuoState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ting YuWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qiongwen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qingyu FuWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yuzhu HuWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Mengmeng XiangWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Haoning PengWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tianying ZhengWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Li LuCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Huashan ShiState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-639X
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundN-cadherin is an important molecular in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and has been reported to be associated with aggressive behaviours of tumours. However, prognostic value of N-cadherin in solid malignancies remains controversially. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Pubmed/MELINE and EMBASE databases were used for a comprehensive literature searching. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to quantify the prognostic role.

resultsInvolving 36 studies with 5705 patients were performed to investigate relationships between N-cadherin upregulation and clinicopathological features, survival. Results suggested upregulated N-cadherin was associated with lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.00, 1.35]), higher histological grade (RR = 1.36, 95%CI [1.14, 1.62]), angiolymphatic invasion (RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.06, 1.34]) and advanced clinical stage (RR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.06, 1.64]), while upregulated N-cadherin was apt to be associated with distant metastasis (RR = 1.43, 95% CI [0.99, 2.05]). Moreover, N-cadherin was correlated with poor prognosis of 3-year survival (HR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.51, 2.10]), 5-year survival (HR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.17, 2.10]) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.20, 1.44]). Subgroup analyses according to cancer types were also conducted for applying these conclusions to some tumours more properly. No publication bias was found except subgroup analysis of distant metastasis (P = .652 for Begg's test and 0.023 for Egger's test).

conclusionsTaken together, upregulation of N-cadherin is associated with more aggressive behaviours of epithelial-derived solid malignancies and can be regarded as a predictor of poor survival.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCadherinsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival AnalysisUp-RegulationBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsclinicopathological featuresepithelial-derived solid tumoursN-cadherinprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29405291
PMCPMC5887888
OpenAlexW2979836143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.