Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29405177›Full record

ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2018

Study of congenital malformations among the progeny of the personnel of an interforce military shooting range in Sardinia, Italy.

Giannina Satta, Michela Ursi, Claudia Pili, Marcello Campagna, Pierluigi Cocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giannina SattaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Università di Cagliari. gianninasatta@tiscali.it.
Michela Ursi
Claudia Pili
Marcello Campagna
Pierluigi Cocco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClaims of an excess of congenital malformations in a village nearby the military shooting range of Salto di Quirra (PISQ), Sardinia have attracted media attention.

objectiveTo verify such reports with a retrospective study of the reproductive history of the PISQ personnel.

methodsIn 2011, we interviewed 390 soldiers employed at the PISQ shooting range (86.7% of the total workforce) about their reproductive history, including age at first conception, number of live births and spontaneous abortions, and cases of malformations among their progeny, as well as work history and lifestyle habits. We used a job-exposure matrix to assess occupational exposure to radiofrequency, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, solvents and nanoparticles, and whether holding an operative job in the shooting range areas.

resultsThe rate of congenital malformations among the progeny of the study subjects was close to the expectation (20.2x10^-3 live births, 95% CI 6.3-34.0; 8 cases observed versus 8.6 expected based on the 2005 rate of the Emilia Romagna region), it was lower in the years subsequent to the onset of service at PISQ (11.0x10^-3, 95% CI 0.0-26.1; two cases observed versus 3.9 expected), and it did not vary by residence in the surrounding villages or elsewhere. None of the exposures we assessed was associated with an increase in the rate of congenital malformations.

conclusionsThe limited statistical power of our study allows to exclude that a strong excess of congenital malformations occurred among the progeny of the PISQ shooting range personnel.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureMilitary PersonnelOccupational ExposureAdultCongenital AbnormalitiesHumansItalyRetrospective Studiesagenti teratogeniattività militariesposizione paternamalformazioni congenite

Identifiers

PMID29405177
PMCPMC7682155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.