Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29405109›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2018

Characterizing Potential Risks of Fecal-Oral Microbial Transmission for Infants and Young Children in Rural Zambia.

Brie Reid, Jennifer Orgle, Khrist Roy, Catherine Pongolani, Modesta Chileshe, Rebecca Stoltzfus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measurement in the study of human exposure to animal feces: A systematic review and audit.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Multi-Sectoral Participatory Design of a BabyWASH Playspace for Rural Ethiopian Households.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brie ReidInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jennifer OrgleCARE USA, Atlanta, Georgia.
Khrist RoyCARE USA, Atlanta, Georgia.
Catherine PongolaniCARE International Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Modesta ChilesheUniversity of North Carolina, Kamwala-ECHO Site, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rebecca StoltzfusDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
CARE USA · USCornell University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undernourished children in low-income contexts often suffer from environmental enteric disorder-damage to the intestines probably caused by chronic exposure to bacterial pathogens from feces. We aimed to identify strategies for reducing infants and young children's (IYC) exposure to human and animal feces in rural farming families by conducting direct observation of 30 caregiver-infant dyads for 143 hours and recording water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)-related behaviors to identify possible pathways of fecal-oral transmission of bacteria among IYC in rural Zambia. In addition to mouthing visibly dirty hands, toys, sibling's body parts, and food, 14 IYC actively ingested 6.1 ± 2.5 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) pieces of soil and stones and one ingested animal feces 6.0 ± 0 times in the span of 5 hours. Ninety-three percent (21 of 30) of mothers reported observing the index-child eating soil and 17% (5 of 30) of mothers reported observing the index-child eating chicken feces. Adult and child handwashing was uncommon, and even though 70% (28 of 30) of households had access to a latrine, human feces were found in 67% of homestead yards. Most animals present in the household were un-corralled, and the highest observable counts of feces came from chickens, pigs, and cattle. To protect IYC in low-income communities from the exploratory ingestion of feces and soil, Baby WASH interventions will need to interrupt fecal-oral microbial transmission vectors specific to IYC with a focus on feasibility, caregiver practices, and local perceptions of risk.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAdultAnimalsBacterial InfectionsCattleChickensChildChild, PreschoolFamily CharacteristicsFecesFemaleHand DisinfectionHumansHygieneInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID29405109
PMCPMC5930879
OpenAlexW2793345173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.