Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404977›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2018

Drug-Induced Ototoxicity: Diagnosis and Monitoring.

Kathleen C M Campbell, Colleen G Le Prell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A longitudinal community-based ototoxicity monitoring programme and treatment effects for drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment, Western Cape.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen C M CampbellDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, PO Box 9626, Springfield, IL, 62704-9626, USA. kcampbell@siumed.edu.
Colleen G Le PrellCallier Center for Communication Disorders, University of Texas at Dallas, 1966 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ototoxicity diagnosis and management has historically been approached using a variety of methods. However, in recent years a consensus on useful and practical approaches has been developed through clinical guidelines of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, the American Academy of Audiology, and multiple clinical trials published in peer-reviewed literature. Some of the guidelines and approaches are used to detect and monitor ototoxicity, while others are used to grade adverse events. Some of the audiologic measures are primary, while others are adjunct measures and may be tailored to the specific needs of the patient or clinical trial. For some types of monitoring, such as drug-induced tinnitus or dizziness, validated paper survey instruments can be both sensitive and easy for fragile patients. This review addresses the characteristics of some of the most common clinical ototoxins and the most common methods for detecting and monitoring ototoxicity in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicCochlear NerveDrug MonitoringDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHearing DisordersHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29404977
OpenAlexW2785507068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.