Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404921›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2018

Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Cristina C Rutherford, Audrey H Calderwood

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bowel preparation: The elderly, the hospitalized, and the colonoscope.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristina C RutherfordDepartment of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Audrey H CalderwoodDepartment of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. Audrey.H.Calderwood@hitchcock.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewColonoscopy is the gold standard for visualization and diagnosis of conditions involving the colon and terminal ileum. It also facilitates screening and prevention of colorectal cancer, which is the second leading cause of cancer death in the USA. Adequate cleansing is essential for thorough visualization of the colon with successful detection of colon polyps. RECENT

findingsWhile the original large-volume polyethylene glycol preparations are still commonly used, several lower volume regimens are widely available and selected based on provider and patient preferences. There remains a strong urge from patients for an even lower volume and more palatable regimen. Split-dose preparation is strongly recommended and additional data has come to support same-day preparation regimens as well. Despite extensive research and comparison of various preparation regimens, between 10 and 25% of patients continue to have inadequate colon cleansing on the day of colonoscopy. Several patient factors have been associated with poor preparation and this chapter will touch on scoring systems, which may be used to predict colon cleansing. Documentation of preparation quality is essential to guide the practitioner in timing of follow-up examination. We recommend the use of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) which is a validated and reliable scale for evaluation of cleansing. In patients with an inadequate preparation, we emphasize the importance of repeat examinations with consideration of a more aggressive preparation regimen. We predict that dietary liberalization prior to colonoscopy will be more commonly practiced in the future as it improves both patient satisfaction and adherence. Thorough bowel cleansing is essential for visualization of the colon with successful detection of colon polyps. While polyethylene glycol regimens are still the most commonly used for preparation, recommendations regarding dose timing and volume continue to evolve to optimize patient satisfaction and success of bowel cleanse. As the patients presenting for colonoscopy are evermore complex with medical comorbidities and extensive medication lists, a patient-centered approach to colonoscopy preparation will likely yield the highest rates of success.

Indexed as

Bowel preparationColonoscopyPolyethylene glycolQuality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.