Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404844›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2018

Breast cancer and chronic pain: a mixed methods review.

Lorraine R Feeney, Shona M Tormey, Dominic C Harmon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06101849 (Evaluating an Online Interprofessional Chronic Pain Management Group for Survivors of Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06101849 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating an Online Interprofessional Chronic Pain Management Group for Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2024 to 2025Enrolled23ConditionsBreast Cancer, Cancer, Treatment-Related, Pain CancerArmsI-Can-Manage-Pain after cancer (Pain Management Program)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Changes in Pain Sensitivity in Treatment for Breast Cancer: A 12-Month Follow-Up Case Series.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Older Women and Opioid Analgesia after Breast Cancer Surgery.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorraine R FeeneyGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Shona M TormeyDepartment of Surgery, Limerick University Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
Dominic C HarmonGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. harmondominic@gmail.com.
University Hospital Limerick · IEUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore patients are surviving breast cancer; however, many complain of persistent pain, which significantly impacts on their lives. Studies have predominantly examined risk factors alone. This mixed methods study will systematically compare prospective and retrospective studies of chronic pain following breast cancer treatment. A wider scope than risk factors alone is included in a narrative review element.

resultsCommon risk factors and themes were identified, and these were compared with some of the retrospective literature available. Several common themes arose in the literature such as common patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative management, treatment modalities and psychological factors. The variation in disease severity, treatment mode and symptom progression between participants in the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions from both the prospective and retrospective literature.

conclusionChronic pain is common after breast cancer. The literature has focused predominantly on risk factors for the development of chronic pain. It may be more beneficial to focus on chronic pain mechanisms and to consider the patient's narrative and experience of their illness and how this has impacted on the perception and intensity of persistent pain. A shared understanding between the patient and professional is likely to have more beneficial outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsChronic PainFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBreast cancer painNarrative medicinePersistentReviewTherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID29404844
OpenAlexW2791251908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.