Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404812›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2018

Evaluation of the genotoxic effects of formocresol application in vital pulp therapy of primary teeth: a clinical study and meta-analysis.

Arnoldo Vasconcelos de Alencar Filho, Valdeci Elias Dos Santos Junior, Merilane da Silva Calixto, Neide Santos, Monica Vilela Heimer, Aronita Rosenblatt

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arnoldo Vasconcelos de Alencar FilhoDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Av. Gal. Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, 54756-220, Brazil. arnoldofilho@gmail.com.
Valdeci Elias Dos Santos JuniorDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Av. Gal. Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, 54756-220, Brazil.
Merilane da Silva CalixtoDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Neide SantosDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Monica Vilela HeimerDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Av. Gal. Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, 54756-220, Brazil.
Aronita RosenblattDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Av. Gal. Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, 54756-220, Brazil.
Universidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis in vivo research investigated whether pulp treatments using formocresol for 7 days would cause mutagenic changes in children's lymphocytes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe mutagenicity was tested in lymphocyte cultures established from the peripheral blood of children living in Brazil. The samples consisted of 2000 cells from teeth undergoing formocresol pulpotomies in which the formocresol pellet was sealed in the primary tooth for 7 days. It was removed on the seventh day, the base was placed, and the tooth was restored. Two venous blood samples (6-8 ml) were collected from each child; the first was prior to pulp therapy, and the second was 7 days later. Two thousand metaphases were analyzed. The level of significance adopted for the statistics was P < 0.05, and a random effects meta-analysis was performed combining this and two previous studies.

resultsThere was no significant difference found in the metaphase analysis between the blood samples taken before and after the pulpotomy treatment (Wilcoxon signed rank test); however, the meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the combined studies.

conclusionsThis study did not reveal any mutagenic effects, but based on the combined meta-analysis, we recommend the careful use of formocresol. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This research helps to bring scientific evidence of the safe use of formocresol in deciduous pulpotomy treatments.

Indexed as

PulpotomyBrazilCells, CulturedChildChild, PreschoolDental PulpFemaleFormocresolsHumansLymphocytesMaleMutagenicity TestsTooth, DeciduousformocresolFormocresolsFormaldehydeFormocresolGenotoxicityMutagenesisPulpotomy

Identifiers

PMID29404812
OpenAlexW2793427897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.