Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404768›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Dailin Rong, Yize Mao, Wanming Hu, Shuhang Xu, Jun Wang, Haoqiang He, Shengping Li, Rong Zhang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MRI for restaging pancreatic cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dailin RongState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yize MaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Wanming HuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Shuhang XuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jun WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Haoqiang HeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Shengping LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China. lishp@sysucc.org.cn.
Rong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China. zhangr@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1188-0640
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic potential of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) DWI for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph node stations (LNS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

methods59 LNS histologically diagnosed following surgical resection from 15 patients were included. IVIM DWI with 12 b values was added to the standard MRI protocol. Evaluation of parameters was performed pre-operatively and included the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f). Diagnostic performance of ADC, D, D* and f for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic LNS was evaluated using ROC analysis.

resultsMetastatic LNS had significantly lower D, D*, f and ADC values than the non-metastatic LNS (p< 0.01). The best diagnostic performance was found in D, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.979, while the area under the ROC curve values of D*, f and ADC were 0.867, 0.855 and 0.940, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were D = 1.180 × 10

conclusionIVIM DWI is useful for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic LNS in PDAC. KEY POINTS: • IVIM DWI is feasible for diagnosing LN metastasis in PDAC. • Metastatic LNS has lower D, D*, f, ADC values than non-metastatic LNS. • D-value from IVIM model has best diagnostic performance, followed by ADC value. • D* has the lowest AUC value.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMotionNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesROC CurveDiffusion-weighted imagingIntravoxel incoherent motionLymph node stationMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic ductal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29404768
OpenAlexW2787827585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.