Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404756›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2018

Why I Quit Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)? A Mixed-Method Study Exploring Reasons for PrEP Discontinuation and Potential Re-initiation Among Gay and Bisexual Men.

Thomas H F Whitfield, Steven A John, H Jonathon Rendina, Christian Grov, Jeffrey T Parsons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Randomized controlled trial of a relationship education and HIV prevention program for young male couples: Biomedical and behavioral outcomes.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas H F WhitfieldCenter for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), 695 Park Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Steven A JohnCenter for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), 695 Park Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA.
H Jonathon RendinaCenter for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), 695 Park Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Christian GrovCUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey T ParsonsCenter for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), 695 Park Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA. Jeffrey.Parsons@hunter.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-7566
The Graduate Center, CUNY · USCity University of New York · US

Funding

Syndemics and resilience for HIV transmission in a national sample of vulnerableR01DA036466 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN, RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Developing a mobile emotion regulation intervention for HIV-positive menK01DA039030 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2015 to 2018
$743k
National Institute on Drug Abuse K01-DA039030National Institute on Drug Abuse (US) R01-DA036466NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039030NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature concerning pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among gay and bisexual identifying men (GBM) has explored facilitators and barriers to uptake and adherence. Far less reported are the reasons why GBM discontinue PrEP use. A national sample of 1071 GBM completed surveys about PrEP use and discontinuation. Participants who were still taking PrEP the 24-month follow up were compared to those that had stopped. Eighteen percent (n = 31) of GBM who reported ever using PrEP discontinued use. Younger (AOR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00), and unemployed (AOR = 4.58; 95% CI 1.43-14.70) GBM were more likely to discontinue PrEP than their counterparts. Those that discontinued provided details on why via a free response question. The most common reasons for discontinuation were lower perceived HIV risk (50%) and cost/insurance (30%). Reasons for potential re-initiation included higher-risk sexual activities and changes to structural related barriers. More research is needed to inform interventions on how GBM can continue taking PrEP during changes to employment that effect insurance coverage and cost.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultBisexualityHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionSafe SexSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGay and bisexual menHIV preventionMedication discontinuationPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Sexual risk perception

Identifiers

PMID29404756
PMCPMC6077114
OpenAlexW2790887680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.