Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404735›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2018

Riluzole and other prognostic factors in ALS: a population-based registry study in Italy.

Jessica Mandrioli, Sara Angela Malerba, Ettore Beghi, Nicola Fini, Antonio Fasano, Elisabetta Zucchi, Silvia De Pasqua, Carlo Guidi, Emilio Terlizzi, Elisabetta Sette and 17 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multidisciplinary care in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Canadian best practice recommendations for the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica MandrioliDepartment of Neuroscience, St. Agostino-Estense Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini n. 1355, 41100, Modena, Italy. j.mandrioli@ausl.mo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9244-9782
Sara Angela MalerbaDepartment of Neuroscience, St. Agostino-Estense Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini n. 1355, 41100, Modena, Italy.
Ettore BeghiDepartment of Neuroscience, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Nicola FiniDepartment of Neuroscience, St. Agostino-Estense Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini n. 1355, 41100, Modena, Italy.
Antonio FasanoDepartment of Neuroscience, St. Agostino-Estense Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini n. 1355, 41100, Modena, Italy.
Elisabetta ZucchiDepartment of Neuroscience, St. Agostino-Estense Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini n. 1355, 41100, Modena, Italy.
Silvia De PasquaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna and IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo GuidiDepartment of Neurology, Forlì Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Emilio TerlizziDepartment of Neurology, G. Da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
Elisabetta SetteDepartment of Neurology, St. Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandro RavasioDepartment of Neurology, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Mario CasmiroDepartment of Neurology, Faenza and Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Fabrizio SalviNeurology Unit, Bellaria Hospital, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rocco LiguoriDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna and IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lucia ZinnoDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Yasmin HandoukDepartment of Neurology, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Romana RizziDepartment of Neurology, IRCCS Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Annamaria BorghiNeurology Unit, Maggiore Hospital, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rita RinaldiDepartment of Neuroscience, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Doriana MediciDepartment of Neurology, Fidenza Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Mario SantangeloDepartment of Neurology, Carpi Hospital, Modena, Italy.
Enrico GranieriDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Vittoria MussutoDepartment of Neurology, Imola Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Marina AielloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Salvatore FerroDepartment of Hospital Services, Emilia Romagna Regional Health Authority, Bologna, Italy.
Marco VincetiEnvironmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center (CREAGEN), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Medical School, Modena, Italy.
ERRALS Group
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Parma · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITGuglielmo da Saliceto Hospital · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITSanta Maria Nuova Hospital · ITSidac (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this prospective population-based registry study on ALS survival, we investigated the role of riluzole treatment, together with other clinical factors, on the prognosis in incident ALS cases in Emilia Romagna Region (ERR), Italy.

methodsA registry for ALS has been collecting all incident cases in ERR since 2009. Detailed clinical data from all patients diagnosed with ALS between 1.1.2009 and 31.12.2014 have been analyzed for this study, with last follow up date set at 31.12.2015.

resultsDuring the 6 years of the study, there were 681 incident cases with a median tracheostomy-free survival of 40 months (95% CI 36-44) from onset and of 26 months (95% CI 24-30) from diagnosis; 573 patients (84.14%) were treated with riluzole, 207 (30.39%) patients underwent gastrostomy, 246 (36.12%) non invasive ventilation, and 103 (15.15%) invasive ventilation. Patients who took treatment for ≥ 75% of disease duration from diagnosis had a median survival of 29 months compared to 18 months in patients with < 75% treatment duration. In multivariable analysis, factors independently influencing survival were age at onset (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05, p < 0.001), dementia (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.32, p = 0.027), degree of diagnostic certainty (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = 0.021), gastrostomy (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.88, p = 0.003), NIV (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.82, p = 0.004), and weight loss at diagnosis (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.001), diagnostic delay (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.004), and % treatment duration (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001).

conclusionsIndependently from other prognostic factors, patients who received riluzole for a longer period of time survived longer, but further population based studies are needed to verify if long-tem use of riluzole prolongs survival.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCommunity Health PlanningDelayed DiagnosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrostomyHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuroprotective AgentsPrognosisRegistriesNeuroprotective AgentsRiluzoleAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisPrognostic factorsRiluzoleSurvivalTherapeutic intervention

Identifiers

PMID29404735
OpenAlexW2786451022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.